BACKGROUND: The goal of this work was to identify mechanisms for the inability of metastatic prostate cancer cells to engage the apoptotic pathway following hormonal or cytotoxic therapy. METHODS: Genotypically diverse cell lines isolated from patients with metastatic disease were used. RESULTS: The LNCaP and TsuPr(1) lines exhibited quintessential apoptotic features in response to the pleiotropic apoptotic inducer staurosporine (STS): rapid cytochrome c translocation to the cytosol, proteolytic processing and catalytic activation of caspase-3 and -7, proteolytic inactivation of the death substrates DNA fragmentation factor (DFF) and poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP), and TUNEL-positive polyfragmented nuclei. In contrast, DU-145 and PC-3 cells exhibited few, if any, of these features, while appearing necrotic by confocal microscopy. The presence of caspase-3 and -7 without proteolytic processing suggested that the apoptotic blockade was upstream of executioner caspases in these resistant cell lines. To identify the locus of this block, Western blot analysis of cytochrome c subcellular localization and of pro- and antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members was performed, and suggested that heterogeneous expression of these proteins might be the underlying mechanism for apoptotic resistance to STS in these cell lines. Thus, the absence of the proapoptotic Bax in DU-145 cells indicated a mechanism for apoptotic resistance of these cells. Similarly, decreased Bax expression during STS treatment, coupled with overexpression of the antiapoptotic Bcl-x(L) and inability to translocate cytochrome c to the cytosol, provided a mechanism for the insensitivity of PC-3 cells. CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that activation of the apoptotic machinery in metastatic prostate cancer cell lines may be determined by expression levels of Bcl-2 family members, by the ability of cytochrome c to translocate to the cytosol, and by the ability of the caspase pathway to react in response to activation of the mitochondrial phase. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: The goal of this work was to identify mechanisms for the inability of metastatic prostate cancer cells to engage the apoptotic pathway following hormonal or cytotoxic therapy. METHODS: Genotypically diverse cell lines isolated from patients with metastatic disease were used. RESULTS: The LNCaP and TsuPr(1) lines exhibited quintessential apoptotic features in response to the pleiotropic apoptotic inducer staurosporine (STS): rapid cytochrome c translocation to the cytosol, proteolytic processing and catalytic activation of caspase-3 and -7, proteolytic inactivation of the death substrates DNA fragmentation factor (DFF) and poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP), and TUNEL-positive polyfragmented nuclei. In contrast, DU-145 and PC-3 cells exhibited few, if any, of these features, while appearing necrotic by confocal microscopy. The presence of caspase-3 and -7 without proteolytic processing suggested that the apoptotic blockade was upstream of executioner caspases in these resistant cell lines. To identify the locus of this block, Western blot analysis of cytochrome c subcellular localization and of pro- and antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members was performed, and suggested that heterogeneous expression of these proteins might be the underlying mechanism for apoptotic resistance to STS in these cell lines. Thus, the absence of the proapoptotic Bax in DU-145 cells indicated a mechanism for apoptotic resistance of these cells. Similarly, decreased Bax expression during STS treatment, coupled with overexpression of the antiapoptotic Bcl-x(L) and inability to translocate cytochrome c to the cytosol, provided a mechanism for the insensitivity of PC-3 cells. CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that activation of the apoptotic machinery in metastatic prostate cancer cell lines may be determined by expression levels of Bcl-2 family members, by the ability of cytochrome c to translocate to the cytosol, and by the ability of the caspase pathway to react in response to activation of the mitochondrial phase. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: J Mad'arová; M Lukesová; A Hlobilková; M Strnad; B Vojtesek; R Lenobel; M Hajdúch; P G Murray; S Perera; Z Kolár Journal: Mol Pathol Date: 2002-08
Authors: Michal Grzmil; Paul Thelen; Bernhard Hemmerlein; Stefan Schweyer; Silke Voigt; Dina Mury; Peter Burfeind Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: M Firczuk; M Gabrysiak; J Barankiewicz; A Domagala; D Nowis; M Kujawa; E Jankowska-Steifer; M Wachowska; E Glodkowska-Mrowka; B Korsak; M Winiarska; J Golab Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2013-07-25 Impact factor: 8.469
Authors: U Syn Ha; Woong Jin Bae; Su Jin Kim; Byung Il Yoon; Sung Hoo Hong; Ji Youl Lee; Tae Kon Hwang; Sung Yeoun Hwang; Zhiping Wang; Sae Woong Kim Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 2.759