BACKGROUND: The major diagnostic role of peripheral lymphocyte subset typing is to distinguish between malignant and reactive conditions. METHODS: The present study evaluates the screening efficacy of flow cytometric lymphocyte subset typing for the presence of a lymphoid malignancy. Four hundred samples were analyzed with a combination of anti-T-, B-, and natural killer (NK)-cell monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty (55%) samples showed a normal distribution of lymphocyte subsets, 73 (18%) samples exhibited unspecific alterations of lymphocyte subsets, 19 (5%) samples exhibited a reactive phenotype typical of Epstein-Barr virus/cytomegalovirus (EBV/CMV) infection, and 88 (22%) samples expressed a phenotype suggestive of lymphoma. The most predictive independent factor of a lymphoma-specific phenotype was the absolute lymphocyte count (P = 0.0001, odds ratio 73.225). Seventy-eight percent of samples containing >/=4 x 10(9)/l lymphocytes and 2% of samples with lymphocyte counts <4 x 10(9)/l exhibited a lymphoma-specific phenotype. The specificity of the referring clinical comment was the second best predictor of a lymphoma-specific typing outcome (P = 0.0001, odds ratio 19.589). The independent predictive values of lymphocyte morphology and of relative lymphocyte counts were of borderline significance. CONCLUSIONS: The use of flow cytometric lymphocyte subset typing as a diagnostic screening method for lymphoma should be restricted to cases of unexplained elevation of absolute lymphocyte counts with or without morphological atypias and to cases with definite clinical symptoms of lymphoma. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: The major diagnostic role of peripheral lymphocyte subset typing is to distinguish between malignant and reactive conditions. METHODS: The present study evaluates the screening efficacy of flow cytometric lymphocyte subset typing for the presence of a lymphoid malignancy. Four hundred samples were analyzed with a combination of anti-T-, B-, and natural killer (NK)-cell monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty (55%) samples showed a normal distribution of lymphocyte subsets, 73 (18%) samples exhibited unspecific alterations of lymphocyte subsets, 19 (5%) samples exhibited a reactive phenotype typical of Epstein-Barr virus/cytomegalovirus (EBV/CMV) infection, and 88 (22%) samples expressed a phenotype suggestive of lymphoma. The most predictive independent factor of a lymphoma-specific phenotype was the absolute lymphocyte count (P = 0.0001, odds ratio 73.225). Seventy-eight percent of samples containing >/=4 x 10(9)/l lymphocytes and 2% of samples with lymphocyte counts <4 x 10(9)/l exhibited a lymphoma-specific phenotype. The specificity of the referring clinical comment was the second best predictor of a lymphoma-specific typing outcome (P = 0.0001, odds ratio 19.589). The independent predictive values of lymphocyte morphology and of relative lymphocyte counts were of borderline significance. CONCLUSIONS: The use of flow cytometric lymphocyte subset typing as a diagnostic screening method for lymphoma should be restricted to cases of unexplained elevation of absolute lymphocyte counts with or without morphological atypias and to cases with definite clinical symptoms of lymphoma. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Yongjun Jo; Soo Hwa Kim; Kwangsang Koh; Jongmoon Park; Yang Bo Shim; Jihyang Lim; Yonggoo Kim; Yeon-Joon Park; Kyungja Han Journal: Korean J Lab Med Date: 2011-06-28