Literature DB >> 10679321

Activating the DNA damage checkpoint in a developmental context.

T T Su1, J Walker, J Stumpff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies in unicellular systems have established that DNA damage by irradiation invokes a checkpoint that acts to stall cell division. During metazoan development, the modulation of cell division by checkpoints must occur in the context of gastrulation, differential gene expression and changes in cell cycle regulation. To understand the effects of checkpoint activation in a developmental context, we examined the effect of X-rays on post-blastoderm embryos of Drosophila melanogaster.
RESULTS: In Drosophila, DNA damage was previously found to delay anaphase chromosome separation during cleavage cycles that lack a G2 phase. In post-blastoderm cycles that included a G2 phase, we found that irradiation delayed the entry into mitosis. Gastrulation and the developmental program of string (Cdc25) gene expression, which normally regulates the timing of mitosis, occurred normally after irradiation. The radiation-induced delay of mitosis accompanied the exclusion of mitotic cyclins from the nucleus. Furthermore, a mutant form of the mitotic kinase Cdk1 that cannot be inhibited by phosphorylation drove a mitotic cyclin into the nucleus and overcame the delay of mitosis induced by irradiation.
CONCLUSIONS: Developmental changes in the cell cycle, for example, the introduction of a G2 phase, dictate the response to checkpoint activation, for example, delaying mitosis instead of or in addition to delaying anaphase. This unprecedented finding suggests that different mechanisms are used at different points during metazoan development to stall cell division in response to checkpoint activation. The delay of mitosis in post-blastoderm embryos is due primarily to inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdk1, whereas nuclear exclusion of a cyclin-Cdk1 complex might play a secondary role. Delaying cell division has little effect on gastrulation and developmentally regulated string gene expression, supporting the view that development generally dictates cell proliferation and not vice versa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10679321     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00300-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  9 in total

1.  The Drosophila chk2 gene loki is essential for embryonic DNA double-strand-break checkpoints induced in S phase or G2.

Authors:  Nisrine Masrouha; Long Yang; Sirine Hijal; Stéphane Larochelle; Beat Suter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  DNA replication and damage checkpoints and meiotic cell cycle controls in the fission and budding yeasts.

Authors:  H Murakami; P Nurse
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Regulation of mitosis in response to damaged or incompletely replicated DNA require different levels of Grapes (Drosophila Chk1).

Authors:  Amanda Purdy; Lyle Uyetake; Melissa Garner Cordeiro; Tin Tin Su
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Phenotypic analysis of separation-of-function alleles of MEI-41, Drosophila ATM/ATR.

Authors:  Anne Laurençon; Amanda Purdy; Jeff Sekelsky; R Scott Hawley; Tin Tin Su
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Cell cycle roles for two 14-3-3 proteins during Drosophila development.

Authors:  T T Su; D H Parry; B Donahoe; C T Chien; P H O'Farrell; A Purdy
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  The effect of a DNA damaging agent on embryonic cell cycles of the cnidarian Hydractinia echinata.

Authors:  Tin Tin Su
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Tuberous sclerosis complex and Myc coordinate the growth and division of Drosophila intestinal stem cells.

Authors:  Alla Amcheslavsky; Naoto Ito; Jin Jiang; Y Tony Ip
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Histone supply regulates S phase timing and cell cycle progression.

Authors:  Ufuk Günesdogan; Herbert Jäckle; Alf Herzig
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  In vitro developmental ability of ovine oocytes following intracytoplasmic injection with freeze-dried spermatozoa.

Authors:  Maite Olaciregui; Victoria Luño; Paula Domingo; Noelia González; Lydia Gil
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.