Literature DB >> 10677653

Application of risk assessment and decision analysis to the evaluation, ranking and selection of environmental remediation alternatives.

E J Bonano1, G E Apostolakis, P F Salter, A Ghassemi, S Jennings.   

Abstract

A single framework integrating risk assessment and decision analysis methods for evaluating, ranking and selecting preferred remediation alternatives at a contaminated site was developed and demonstrated. The methodology used relies on stakeholder inputs throughout the entire process and employs those inputs to combine the results of multiple risk assessments to arrive at a total impact for each remediation alternative. The total impact values allow the ranking of the alternatives, which in turn, serves as the basis for deliberations among the stakeholders in order to identify the preferred alternative. Six major risk or impact categories were considered in the evaluation of the alternatives: human health and safety, environmental protection, life cycle cost, socio-economics, cultural, archeological and historical resources, and programmatic assumptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10677653     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(99)00071-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  4 in total

1.  Nuclear waste transportation: case studies of identifying stakeholder risk information needs.

Authors:  Christina H Drew; Deirdre A Grace; Susan M Silbernagel; Erin S Hemmings; Alan Smith; William C Griffith; Timothy K Takaro; Elaine M Faustman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.031

2.  The role of stakeholder attitudes in managing contaminated sites: survey of Romanian stakeholder awareness.

Authors:  I C Stezar; A Ozunu; D L Barry
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Using multiple indices to evaluate scenarios for the remediation of contaminated land: the Porto Marghera (Venice, Italy) contaminated site.

Authors:  Andrea Critto; Paola Agostini
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks.

Authors:  David J Briggs
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 5.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.