S Talwar1, A Siebenhofer, B Williams, L Ng. 1. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the relation between plasma concentration of the N terminal of the precursor of brain natriuretic peptide (NT proBNP), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in patients with a history of hypertension. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Teaching hospital based study. PATIENTS: NT proBNP concentrations were determined in five groups of individuals. Group 1: 15 echocardiographic normal controls; group 2: 22 patients with hypertension, normal left ventricular systolic function, and no LVH; group 3: 24 patients with hypertension, normal left ventricular systolic function, and LVH; group 4: 13 patients with history of hypertension, no history of ischaemic heart disease, and left ventricular wall motion index (WMI) between 1.9-1.3; and group 5:17 patients with a history of hypertension, no history of ischaemic heart disease, and WMI < 1.2. RESULTS: Median (range) NT proBNP concentrations (in fmol/ml) for groups 1-5, respectively, were: 129.4 (53.6-159.7), 147.4 (54.3-730. 5), 137.1 (35.8-403.9), 356.7 (124.4-934.4), and 493.5 (248.9-909). Mean log NT proBNP differed among all five groups (p < 0.0001), and between groups 4 and 5 versus groups 1-3 (p < 0.0001), and group 4 versus group 5 (p = 0.02) only. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the presence of hypertension with or without LVH (and normal left ventricular systolic function) does not affect NT proBNP concentrations. Moreover, there is a significant rise in NT proBNP only when LVSD develops in hypertension. Thus, NT proBNP remains a useful diagnostic aid for LVSD, even in hypertensive patients.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the relation between plasma concentration of the N terminal of the precursor of brain natriuretic peptide (NT proBNP), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in patients with a history of hypertension. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Teaching hospital based study. PATIENTS: NT proBNP concentrations were determined in five groups of individuals. Group 1: 15 echocardiographic normal controls; group 2: 22 patients with hypertension, normal left ventricular systolic function, and no LVH; group 3: 24 patients with hypertension, normal left ventricular systolic function, and LVH; group 4: 13 patients with history of hypertension, no history of ischaemic heart disease, and left ventricular wall motion index (WMI) between 1.9-1.3; and group 5:17 patients with a history of hypertension, no history of ischaemic heart disease, and WMI < 1.2. RESULTS: Median (range) NT proBNP concentrations (in fmol/ml) for groups 1-5, respectively, were: 129.4 (53.6-159.7), 147.4 (54.3-730. 5), 137.1 (35.8-403.9), 356.7 (124.4-934.4), and 493.5 (248.9-909). Mean log NT proBNP differed among all five groups (p < 0.0001), and between groups 4 and 5 versus groups 1-3 (p < 0.0001), and group 4 versus group 5 (p = 0.02) only. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the presence of hypertension with or without LVH (and normal left ventricular systolic function) does not affect NT proBNP concentrations. Moreover, there is a significant rise in NT proBNP only when LVSD develops in hypertension. Thus, NT proBNP remains a useful diagnostic aid for LVSD, even in hypertensivepatients.
Authors: M Mukoyama; K Nakao; Y Saito; Y Ogawa; K Hosoda; S Suga; G Shirakami; M Jougasaki; H Imura Journal: Lancet Date: 1990-03-31 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M Kohno; T Horio; K Yokokawa; K Murakawa; K Yasunari; K Akioka; A Tahara; I Toda; K Takeuchi; N Kurihara Journal: Am J Med Date: 1992-01 Impact factor: 4.965