BACKGROUND: Previous studies have been inconsistent about the degree of sexual transmissibility of cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. The authors hypothesize that risk factors for HPV infection vary according to HPV type. GOAL: To estimate the prevalence of HPV infection in asymptomatic women and to identify risk factors for overall HPV infection and HPV infection by oncogenic and nononcogenic type. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the McGill University clinic in Montreal. Cervical specimens were collected from 489 female students presenting at the clinic for a routine Papanicolaou test. Data on potential risk factors was obtained by questionnaire. Human papillomavirus DNA was detected by the polymerase chain reaction using consensus primers (MY09/11) followed by hybridization with generic and type-specific probes using Southern blot and dot blot techniques. RESULTS: The overall HPV prevalence was 21.8%. A low-risk HPV infection was found in 6.2% of the women, 11.8% had a high-risk HPV infection (types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58), 7.1% had an unknown HPV type, and 2.7% had a multiple type infection. Two profiles emerged for sexual activity and risk of HPV infection according to oncogenic risk after multivariate analysis. Lifetime frequency of sexual intercourse and lifetime number of oral sex partners was associated with high-oncogenic-risk HPV infections; however, HPV infection with low-oncogenic-risk types was invariant with respect to markers of sexual activity. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that there are differences in epidemiologic correlates of transmission between low-risk and high-oncogenic-risk HPV types based on oncogenicity. This finding has important implications for primary prevention of HPV infection and cervical cancer precursors.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have been inconsistent about the degree of sexual transmissibility of cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. The authors hypothesize that risk factors for HPV infection vary according to HPV type. GOAL: To estimate the prevalence of HPV infection in asymptomatic women and to identify risk factors for overall HPV infection and HPV infection by oncogenic and nononcogenic type. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the McGill University clinic in Montreal. Cervical specimens were collected from 489 female students presenting at the clinic for a routine Papanicolaou test. Data on potential risk factors was obtained by questionnaire. Human papillomavirus DNA was detected by the polymerase chain reaction using consensus primers (MY09/11) followed by hybridization with generic and type-specific probes using Southern blot and dot blot techniques. RESULTS: The overall HPV prevalence was 21.8%. A low-risk HPV infection was found in 6.2% of the women, 11.8% had a high-risk HPV infection (types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58), 7.1% had an unknown HPV type, and 2.7% had a multiple type infection. Two profiles emerged for sexual activity and risk of HPV infection according to oncogenic risk after multivariate analysis. Lifetime frequency of sexual intercourse and lifetime number of oral sex partners was associated with high-oncogenic-risk HPV infections; however, HPV infection with low-oncogenic-risk types was invariant with respect to markers of sexual activity. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that there are differences in epidemiologic correlates of transmission between low-risk and high-oncogenic-risk HPV types based on oncogenicity. This finding has important implications for primary prevention of HPV infection and cervical cancer precursors.
Authors: E I Svare; S K Kjaer; A M Worm; A Osterlind; C J L M Meijer; A J C van den Brule Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Sharon A Nachman; Miriam Chernoff; Philimon Gona; Russell B Van Dyke; Wayne M Dankner; George R Seage; James Oleske; Paige L Williams Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2009-02
Authors: Susan B Brogly; D Heather Watts; Nathalie Ylitalo; Eduardo L Franco; George R Seage; James Oleske; Michelle Eagle; Russell Van Dyke Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-04-26 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Maria C Bell; Delf Schmidt-Grimminger; Sarah Patrick; Tim Ryschon; Laurie Linz; Subhash C Chauhan Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2007-07-30 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Andrea C Tricco; Carmen H Ng; Vladimir Gilca; Andrea Anonychuk; Ba' Pham; Shirra Berliner Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2011-09-05 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: J Green; A Berrington de Gonzalez; J S Smith; S Franceschi; P Appleby; M Plummer; V Beral Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2003-06-02 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Agnihotram V Ramanakumar; Paulo Naud; Cecilia M Roteli-Martins; Newton S de Carvalho; Paola C de Borba; Julio C Teixeira; Mark Blatter; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Diane M Harper; Barbara Romanowski; Stephen K Tyring; Brian Ramjattan; Anne Schuind; Gary Dubin; Eduardo L Franco Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 2.692