Literature DB >> 10675063

Gender differences in exerted forces and physiological load during pushing and pulling of wheeled cages by postal workers.

A J van der Beek1, B D Kluver, M H Frings-Dresen, M J Hoozemans.   

Abstract

The aim was to determine gender differences regarding exerted forces and physiological load during push/pull tasks simulating the daily working practice of postal workers. Eight female and four male workers handled four-wheeled cages under eight conditions corresponding to the cage weight (130, 250, 400, 550 kg) and the direction of force exertion (pushing, pulling). For each of the five dependent variables, average force, initial force, ending force, oxygen uptake and heart rate, two analyses of variance with repeated measurements were performed, i.e. with and without correction for the worker's body weight, body height and maximum capacity regarding the dependent variable. Exerted forces and physiological load were high for the cages weighing 400 and 550 kg. Gender differences were significant for all dependent variables (p = 0.030-0.000). When the personal factors were included in the model, male workers exerted significantly higher average forces and ending forces than their females, while differences regarding initial forces and physiological load were not significant. However, none of the personal factors were significantly related to any of the dependent variables. It is concluded that gender differences in exerted forces were not caused by differences in anthropometry and maximum capacity, but due to application of different work methods by women in order to balance work demands and work ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10675063     DOI: 10.1080/001401300184602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Pushing and pulling in association with low back and shoulder complaints.

Authors:  M J M Hoozemans; A J van der Beek; M H W Frings-Dresen; L H V van der Woude; F J H van Dijk
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Low-back biomechanics and static stability during isometric pushing.

Authors:  Kevin R Granata; Bradford C Bennett
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Sex differences in muscular load among house painters performing identical work tasks.

Authors:  Jacob Meyland; Thomas Heilskov-Hansen; Tine Alkjær; Henrik Koblauch; Sigurd Mikkelsen; Susanne Wulff Svendsen; Jane Frølund Thomsen; Gert-Åke Hansson; Erik B Simonsen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Psychophysical basis for maximum pushing and pulling forces: A review and recommendations.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Thomas Waters; Jay Kapellusch; Waldemar Karwowski
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.656

5.  Evaluation of Interhandle Distance During Pushing and Pulling of a Four-Caster Cart for Upper Limb Exertion.

Authors:  Akihiro Ohnishi; Masato Takanokura; Atsushi Sugama
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2016-02-23

Review 6.  Human Body Mechanics of Pushing and Pulling: Analyzing the Factors of Task-related Strain on the Musculoskeletal System.

Authors:  Andreas Argubi-Wollesen; Bettina Wollesen; Martin Leitner; Klaus Mattes
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2016-08-01

7.  Upper Limb Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Operating Room Nurses: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Marco Clari; Giacomo Garzaro; Matteo Di Maso; Francesca Donato; Alessandro Godono; Mario Paleologo; Valerio Dimonte; Enrico Pira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among perioperative nurses: a systematic review and META-analysis.

Authors:  Marco Clari; Alessandro Godono; Giacomo Garzaro; Gianluca Voglino; Maria Rosaria Gualano; Giuseppe Migliaretti; Attilia Gullino; Catalina Ciocan; Valerio Dimonte
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.