Literature DB >> 10675030

Damage recognition in nucleotide excision repair of DNA.

D P Batty1, R D Wood.   

Abstract

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is found throughout nature, in eubacteria, eukaryotes and archaea. In human cells it is the main pathway for the removal of damage caused by UV light, but it also acts on a wide variety of other bulky helix-distorting lesions caused by chemical mutagens. An ongoing challenge is to understand how a site of DNA damage is located during NER and distinguished from non-damaged sites. This article reviews information on damage recognition in mammalian cells and the bacterium Escherichia coli. In mammalian cells the XPC-hHR23B, XPA, RPA and TFIIH factors may all have a role in damage recognition. XPC-hHR23B has the strongest affinity for damaged DNA in some assays, as does the similar budding yeast complex Rad4-Rad23. There is current discussion as to whether XPC or XPA acts first in the repair process to recognise damage or distortions. TFIIH may play a role in distinguishing the damaged strand from the non-damaged one, if translocation along a DNA strand by the TFIIH DNA helicases is interrupted by encountering a lesion. The recognition and incision steps of human NER use 15 to 18 polypeptides, whereas E. coli requires only three proteins to obtain a similar result. Despite this, many remarkable similarities in the NER mechanism have emerged between eukaryotes and bacteria. These include use of a distortion-recognition factor, a strand separating helicase to create an open preincision complex, participation of structure-specific endonucleases and the lack of a need for certain factors when a region containing damage is already sufficiently distorted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10675030     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00489-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  86 in total

1.  Clue to damage recognition by UvrB: residues in the beta-hairpin structure prevent binding to non-damaged DNA.

Authors:  G F Moolenaar; L Höglund; N Goosen
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Photoreactivation of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in the MFA2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Nerys R Morse; Valerie Meniel; Raymond Waters
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Crystal structure of a DNA decamer containing a cis-syn thymine dimer.

Authors:  HaJeung Park; Kaijiang Zhang; Yingjie Ren; Sourena Nadji; Nanda Sinha; John-Stephen Taylor; ChulHee Kang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Regulation and disregulation of mammalian nucleotide excision repair: a pathway to nongermline breast carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Jean J Latimer; Vongai J Majekwana; Yashira R Pabón-Padín; Manasi R Pimpley; Stephen G Grant
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.421

5.  Site-directed recombination via bifunctional PNA-DNA conjugates.

Authors:  Faye A Rogers; Karen M Vasquez; Michael Egholm; Peter M Glazer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Construction and purification of site-specifically modified DNA templates for transcription assays.

Authors:  Rebecca A Perlow; Thomas M Schinecker; Se Jun Kim; Nicholas E Geacintov; David A Scicchitano
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Relating repair susceptibility of carcinogen-damaged DNA with structural distortion and thermodynamic stability.

Authors:  Min Wu; Shixiang Yan; Dinshaw J Patel; Nicholas E Geacintov; Suse Broyde
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Repair of DNA lesions associated with triplex-forming oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Joanna Y Chin; Peter M Glazer
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.784

9.  Local action of the chromatin assembly factor CAF-1 at sites of nucleotide excision repair in vivo.

Authors:  Catherine M Green; Geneviève Almouzni
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  XPA expression is a predictive marker of the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Takuma Wada; Takeshi Fukuda; Masahiro Shimomura; Yuta Inoue; Masaru Kawanishi; Reiko Tasaka; Tomoyo Yasui; Kazuo Ikeda; Toshiyuki Sumi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.