Literature DB >> 10674543

Continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure in the treatment of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema.

J M Kosowsky1, A B Storrow, S C Carleton.   

Abstract

Patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE) are commonly seen in the emergency department (ED). Although the majority of patients respond to conventional medical therapy, some patients require at least temporary ventilatory support. Traditionally, this has been accomplished via endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, an approach that is associated with a small but significant rate of complications. The past 2 decades have witnessed increasing interest in methods of noninvasive ventilatory support (NVS), notably continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP). We review the physiological consequences, clinical efficacy, and practical limitations of CPAP and BiPAP in the management of ACPE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10674543     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-6757(00)90059-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  2 in total

1.  Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: a randomised comparison of continuous positive airway pressure and bi-level positive airway pressure.

Authors:  A M Cross; P Cameron; M Kierce; M Ragg; A M Kelly
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  A comparison of continuous and bi-level positive airway pressure non-invasive ventilation in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kwok M Ho; Karen Wong
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.