Literature DB >> 10674527

Duration of patient immobilization in the ED.

E B Lerner1, R Moscati.   

Abstract

In this article we seek to determine the duration of immobilization in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). We conducted a 10-week prospective study of a convenience sample of patients transported to a level one trauma center immobilized with a backboard and cervical collar. Total backboard time (TBT) was measured from the time the ambulance left the scene to the time the patient was removed from the backboard, while total ED backboard time (TEDBT) was measured from the time of arrival at the ED to the time of backboard removal. There were 138 patients entered in the study. Insufficient data excluded 36 patients from further analysis. TBT was available for 92 patients and averaged 63.63 (+/-45.87) minutes. Dividing patients into those who were removed from the backboard prior to radiographs (n = 85), the TBT average was 53.9 minutes (+/-30.1), whereas the average for those who had radiographs prior to removal from the backboard (n = 7) was 181.3 minutes (+/-41.6). There were 102 patients for whom TEDBT was available and averaged 46.36 (+/-44.88) minutes. Dividing patients into those who were removed from the backboard prior to radiographs (n = 95), the TEDBT average was 37.6 minutes (+/-29.6), whereas the average for those who had radiographs prior to removal from the backboard (n = 7) was 165.3 minutes (+/-49.7). Patients are left on backboards for significant periods of time even when no radiographs are taken prior to backboard removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10674527     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-6757(00)90043-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of a long spinal board and vacuum mattress for spinal immobilisation.

Authors:  M D Luscombe; J L Williams
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Preventing pressure injuries in the emergency department: Current evidence and practice considerations.

Authors:  Nick Santamaria; Sue Creehan; Jacqui Fletcher; Paulo Alves; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Cervical immobilization in trauma patients: soft collars better than rigid collars? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henrik C Bäcker; Patrick Elias; Karl F Braun; Michael A Johnson; Peter Turner; John Cunningham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  Effect of spinal immobilisation devices on radiation exposure in conventional radiography and computed tomography.

Authors:  Baukje Hemmes; Cécile R L P N Jeukens; Gerrit J Kemerink; Peter R G Brink; Martijn Poeze
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-01-11

5.  Backboard time for patients receiving spinal immobilization by emergency medical services.

Authors:  Derek R Cooney; Harry Wallus; Michael Asaly; Susan Wojcik
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-06-20

6.  Effect of spineboard and headblocks on the image quality of head CT scans.

Authors:  Baukje Hemmes; Cécile R L P N Jeukens; Aliaa Al-Haidari; Paul A M Hofman; Ed S Vd Linden; Peter R G Brink; Martijn Poeze
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-04-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.