Literature DB >> 10674502

Litigation in Canada against anesthesiologists practicing regional anesthesia. A review of closed claims.

P W Peng1, K G Smedstad.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the pattern of malpractice litigation related to regional anesthesia in Canada. SOURCE: The Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA) provided with information about all anesthesia claims that closed in the years 1990-1997. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: In the period 1990-97 there were 7,909 closed legal actions involving all CMPA members (56,000). Of these, there were 310 cases involving anesthesiologists, of which 61 cases (approximately 20%) were related to regional anesthesia. Forty-two involved neuraxial blocks, and the legal outcome was favourable (dismissed or judgement in favour of the defendant doctor) in 37 claims. Nineteen claims involved peripheral nerve blocks. All these had favourable legal outcomes. Overall, 10% of regional anesthesia claims have unfavourable outcomes, compared with 28% of all anesthesia related claims and 30% of all CMPA members' claims. The degree of disability in the regional anesthesia claims were: none 10%; minor 49%; major 36%; catastrophic 5%. There were no deaths in the malpractice claims involving regional anesthesia, compared with 17% in the all anesthesia group and 11% in all members' claims.
CONCLUSION: Twenty percent of all anesthesia claims in Canada are related to regional anesthesia. The legal outcome of these claims is favourable in 90%. Unfavourable clinical outcome is associated with catastrophic or major injury. There were no deaths in the regional anesthesia claims.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10674502     DOI: 10.1007/BF03018844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  2 in total

1.  Chronic pain practice by consultant anaesthetists in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  N Alaouabda; D Harmon
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  The Ecology of Defensive Medicine and Malpractice Litigation.

Authors:  Angelo Antoci; Alessandro Fiori Maccioni; Paolo Russu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.