Literature DB >> 10674043

Follow up of women with borderline cervical smears as defined by national guidelines.

M K Heatley1.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the proportion of women with abnormalities in cervical smears corresponding to borderline nuclear change, as defined by national guidelines, which return to normal or persist as cytological or histological abnormalities.
METHODS: 313 women with borderline nuclear change diagnosed by a single pathologist using the national criteria were followed up for up to two years.
RESULTS: On initial follow up, 45% of women had a negative smear or biopsy, 46.5% had a low grade cytological or histological abnormality, and 8.5% had a high grade abnormality. Of 81 patients in whom a second follow up smear or biopsy was available, 47% had no detectable abnormality, 38.5% had low grade lesion, and 14.5% had a high grade lesion. In total, 32 patients (10.2%) had a high grade lesion (defined as moderate or severe dyskaryosis on smear or CINII or CINIII on biopsy) on at least one follow up sample.
CONCLUSIONS: The results support the use of the national criteria defining borderline nuclear change in identifying women at increased risk of developing a high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, as identified histologically or cytologically, and highlight the importance of follow up in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10674043      PMCID: PMC501580          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.52.10.787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  9 in total

1.  Significance of borderline nuclear abnormality in cervical smears.

Authors:  D M Parham; E K Wiredu; K A Hussein
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.073

Review 2.  Current views on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  M C Anderson; C L Brown; C H Buckley; H Fox; D Jenkins; D G Lowe; B T Manners; D H Melcher; A J Robertson; M Wells
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  The borderline cervical smear.

Authors:  M K Heatley
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.073

4.  DNA ploidy profiles as prognostic indicators in CIN lesions.

Authors:  M Bibbo; H E Dytch; E Alenghat; P H Bartels; G L Wied
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Terminology in gynaecological cytopathology: report of the Working Party of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

Authors:  D M Evans; E A Hudson; C L Brown; M M Boddington; H E Hughes; E F Mackenzie; T Marshall
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Nuclear DNA study of vaginal and cervical squamous cell abnormalities in DES exposed progeny.

Authors:  Y S Fu; S J Robboy; J Prat
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  C H Buckley; E B Butler; H Fox
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Definition of precursors.

Authors:  Y S Fu; J W Reagan; R M Richart
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Long term follow up of women with borderline cervical smear test results: effects of age and viral infection on progression to high grade dyskaryosis.

Authors:  L Hirschowitz; A E Raffle; E F Mackenzie; A O Hughes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.