Literature DB >> 10674004

Treatment of normal and malignant cells with nucleoside analogues and etoposide enhances deoxycytidine kinase activity.

T Spasokoukotskaja1, M Sasvári-Székely, G Keszler, F Albertioni, S Eriksson, M Staub.   

Abstract

Deoxycytidine kinase (dCK), one of the rate-limiting enzymes in the intracellular metabolism of many antileukaemic drugs, was shown to be stimulated after treatment of human tonsillar lymphocytes by 2-chloro-2'-deoxyadenosine (cladribine, CdA) (Sasvári-Székely, et al., Biochem Pharmacol 1998, 56, 1175-1179). Here we present a comparative study of different normal and malignant cells in respect to the activation of dCK by CdA. G-phase lymphocytes showed a higher sensitivity for dCK stimulation than S-phase cells. Normal and leukaemic peripheral blood mononuclear cells, as well as the promyelocytic cell line HL60 responded to CdA treatment by a 2-5-fold increase in activity of dCK. However, no significant stimulation was detected either in CCRF-CEM T-lymphoblastoid cells, or in K562 myeloid cells. Thymidine kinase (TK) activity was not stimulated in any cases. Treatment of these cells with several other analogues beside CdA, such as 2-chloro-2'-arabino-fluoro-2'-deoxyadenosine (CAFdA), 2-fluoro-1-beta-D-arabinosyladenine (Fludarabine, FaraA) and 1-beta-D-arabinosylcytosine (cytarabine, araC) gave similar results to CdA treatment. Enhancement of dCK activity could also be achieved with the topoisomerase II inhibitor, etoposide. In contrast, 2-chloro-riboadenosine (CrA) had no effect on the dCK at concentrations of 10 microM or less, while dCyd and 5-aza-dCyd caused slight inhibition. These results indicate that treatment of cells with several inhibitors of DNA synthesis potentiates the dCK activity. The drugs widely differ in their stimulatory effect on dCK, and there are also 'responsive' and 'non-responsive' cells with respect to dCK activation. Thus, enhancement of the dCK activity by specific drugs in 'responsive' cells might give a rationale for combination chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10674004     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00223-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  7 in total

Review 1.  Is Monitoring of the Intracellular Active Metabolite Levels of Nucleobase and Nucleoside Analogs Ready for Precision Medicine Applications?

Authors:  Shenjia Huang; Yicong Bian; Chenrong Huang; Liyan Miao
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.569

2.  Drug-repositioning screening identified fludarabine and risedronic acid as potential therapeutic compounds for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Irene Dell'Anno; Sarah A Martin; Marcella Barbarino; Alessandra Melani; Roberto Silvestri; Maria Bottaro; Elisa Paolicchi; Alda Corrado; Monica Cipollini; Ombretta Melaiu; Antonio Giordano; Luca Luzzi; Federica Gemignani; Stefano Landi
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  The apoptotic effects of toosendanin are partially mediated by activation of deoxycytidine kinase in HL-60 cells.

Authors:  Jianming Ju; Zhichao Qi; Xueting Cai; Peng Cao; Yan Huang; Shuzhen Wang; Nan Liu; Yijun Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Resistance to gemcitabine in a human follicular lymphoma cell line is due to partial deletion of the deoxycytidine kinase gene.

Authors:  Carlos María Galmarini; Marilyn L Clarke; Lars Jordheim; Cheryl L Santos; Emeline Cros; John R Mackey; Charles Dumontet
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol       Date:  2004-05-24

5.  Interaction between gemcitabine and topotecan in human non-small-cell lung cancer cells: effects on cell survival, cell cycle and pharmacogenetic profile.

Authors:  E Giovannetti; V Mey; R Danesi; F Basolo; S Barachini; M Deri; M Del Tacca
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Deoxycytidine kinase augments ATM-Mediated DNA repair and contributes to radiation resistance.

Authors:  Yuri L Bunimovich; Evan Nair-Gill; Mireille Riedinger; Melissa N McCracken; Donghui Cheng; Jami McLaughlin; Caius G Radu; Owen N Witte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Nucleobase and Nucleoside Analogues: Resistance and Re-Sensitisation at the Level of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Metabolism.

Authors:  Nikolaos Tsesmetzis; Cynthia B J Paulin; Sean G Rudd; Nikolas Herold
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.