Literature DB >> 10672135

Evaluation of a computer-based decision support system for treatment of hypertension with drugs: retrospective, nonintervention testing of cost and guideline adherence.

M Persson1, T Mjörndal, B Carlberg, J Bohlin, L H Lindholm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a computerized decision support system (DSS) for drug treatment of hypertension, regarding quality, safety, and cost compared to actual antihypertensive drug treatment.
DESIGN: The medical profiles of 338 hypertensive patients treated with drugs against hypertension were processed by the DSS. The drug treatment proposed by the system was then compared to actual treatment given by their physician.
SETTING: Four health centres in the county of Västerbotten, in Sweden.
SUBJECTS: A list of hypertensive patients was extracted from the computerized medical records of each health centre and every fifth patient's medical profile was assessed by the system.
INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Drug used, drug used in relation to certain major diseases such as diabetes mellitus, asthma, ischaemic heart disease (IHD), and previous myocardial infarction. Adherence to hypertension guidelines, safety, and cost.
RESULTS: The DSS suggested significantly more thiazides and significantly fewer calcium antagonists than the physicians had prescribed, with a total cost reduction of 33-40%, depending on doses chosen. The DSS drug profile was more adherent to guidelines in patients with major complicating diseases, suggesting an improvement in treatment quality for these patients by the DSS.
CONCLUSION: The DSS which fully implements current guidelines may improve the quality of antihypertensive treatment, concurrently leading to a considerable reduction in drug costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10672135     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00581.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intern Med        ISSN: 0954-6820            Impact factor:   8.989


  13 in total

1.  Offline testing of the ATHENA Hypertension decision support system knowledge base to improve the accuracy of recommendations.

Authors:  S B Martins; S Lai; S Tu; R Shankar; S N Hastings; B B Hoffman; N Dipilla; M K Goldstein
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

Review 2.  Hypertension and medical informatics.

Authors:  William McBride; Carlos Ferrario; Paulette A Lyle
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  Using health information technology to improve hypertension management.

Authors:  Mary K Goldstein
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Scope and nature of prescribing decisions made by general practitioners.

Authors:  P Denig; C L M Witteman; H W Schouten
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-06

5.  In search of evidence: family practitioners' use of the Internet for clinical information.

Authors:  Rowena J Cullen
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2002-10

Review 6.  Integrated Chronic Care Management For Patients With Atrial Fibrillation - A Rationale For Redesigning Atrial Fibrillation Care.

Authors:  Jeroen Ml Hendriks; Harry Jgm Crijns; Hubertus Jm Vrijhoef
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-02-28

7.  'Decision support system (DSS) for prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among hypertensive (HTN) patients in Andhra Pradesh, India'--a cluster randomised community intervention trial.

Authors:  Raghupathy Anchala; Hira Pant; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Oscar H Franco
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Measuring value for money: a scoping review on economic evaluation of health information systems.

Authors:  Jesdeep Bassi; Francis Lau
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Non-compliance with a postmastectomy radiotherapy guideline: decision tree and cause analysis.

Authors:  Amir R Razavi; Hans Gill; Hans Ahlfeldt; Nosrat Shahsavar
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Assessing Data Adequacy for High Blood Pressure Clinical Decision Support: A Quantitative Analysis.

Authors:  David A Dorr; Christopher D'Autremont; Christie Pizzimenti; Nicole Weiskopf; Robert Rope; Steven Kassakian; Joshua E Richardson; Rob McClure; Floyd Eisenberg
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 2.762

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.