Literature DB >> 10669725

TATA-binding protein mutants that increase transcription from enhancerless and repressed promoters in vivo.

J V Geisberg1, K Struhl.   

Abstract

Using a genetic screen, we isolated three TATA-binding protein (TBP) mutants that increase transcription from promoters that are repressed by the Cyc8-Tup1 or Sin3-Rpd3 corepressors or that lack an enhancer element, but not from an equivalently weak promoter with a mutated TATA element. Increased transcription is observed when the TBP mutants are expressed at low levels in the presence of wild-type TBP. These TBP mutants are unable to support cell viability, and they are toxic in strains lacking Rpd3 histone deacetylase or when expressed at higher levels. Although these mutants do not detectably bind TATA elements in vitro, genetic and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that they act directly at promoters and do not increase transcription by titration of a negative regulatory factor(s). The TBP mutants are mildly defective for associating with promoters responding to moderate or strong activators; in addition, they are severely defective for RNA polymerase (Pol) III but not Pol I transcription. These results suggest that, with respect to Pol II transcription, the TBP mutants specifically increase expression from core promoters. Biochemical analysis indicates that the TBP mutants are unaffected for TFIID complex formation, dimerization, and interactions with either the general negative regulator NC2 or the N-terminal inhibitory domain of TAF130. We speculate that these TBP mutants have an unusual structure that allows them to preferentially access TATA elements in chromatin templates. These TBP mutants define a criterion by which promoters repressed by Cyc8-Tup1 or Sin3-Rpd3 resemble enhancerless, but not TATA-defective, promoters; hence, they support the idea that these corepressors inhibit the function of activator proteins rather than the Pol II machinery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10669725      PMCID: PMC85312          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.5.1478-1488.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  63 in total

1.  Binding of TBP to promoters in vivo is stimulated by activators and requires Pol II holoenzyme.

Authors:  L Kuras; K Struhl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Dimerization of TFIID when not bound to DNA.

Authors:  A K Taggart; B F Pugh
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-05-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  The role of general initiation factors in transcription by RNA polymerase II.

Authors:  R G Roeder
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 4.  The general transcription factors of RNA polymerase II.

Authors:  G Orphanides; T Lagrange; D Reinberg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 5.  Chromatin structure and RNA polymerase II connection: implications for transcription.

Authors:  K Struhl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-01-26       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  A new class of activation-defective TATA-binding protein mutants: evidence for two steps of transcriptional activation in vivo.

Authors:  L A Stargell; K Struhl
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  The Dr1/DRAP1 heterodimer is a global repressor of transcription in vivo.

Authors:  S Kim; J G Na; M Hampsey; D Reinberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Biochemistry and structural biology of transcription factor IID (TFIID).

Authors:  S K Burley; R G Roeder
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 23.643

9.  Radical mutations reveal TATA-box binding protein surfaces required for activated transcription in vivo.

Authors:  G O Bryant; L S Martel; S K Burley; A J Berk
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 10.  Yeast transcriptional regulatory mechanisms.

Authors:  K Struhl
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 16.830

View more
  13 in total

1.  Tup1p represses Mcm1p transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling of an a-cell-specific gene.

Authors:  I M Gavin; M P Kladde; R T Simpson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  The complete genome of the crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus P2.

Authors:  Q She; R K Singh; F Confalonieri; Y Zivanovic; G Allard; M J Awayez; C C Chan-Weiher; I G Clausen; B A Curtis; A De Moors; G Erauso; C Fletcher; P M Gordon; I Heikamp-de Jong; A C Jeffries; C J Kozera; N Medina; X Peng; H P Thi-Ngoc; P Redder; M E Schenk; C Theriault; N Tolstrup; R L Charlebois; W F Doolittle; M Duguet; T Gaasterland; R A Garrett; M A Ragan; C W Sensen; J Van der Oost
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Cyc8-Tup1 complex inhibits transcription primarily by masking the activation domain of the recruiting protein.

Authors:  Koon Ho Wong; Kevin Struhl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Region of yeast TAF 130 required for TFIID to associate with promoters.

Authors:  M Mencía; K Struhl
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  SWI/SNF binding to the HO promoter requires histone acetylation and stimulates TATA-binding protein recruitment.

Authors:  Doyel Mitra; Emily J Parnell; Jack W Landon; Yaxin Yu; David J Stillman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Multiple functions of the nonconserved N-terminal domain of yeast TATA-binding protein.

Authors:  M Lee; K Struhl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Functional dissection of the global repressor Tup1 in yeast: dominant role of the C-terminal repression domain.

Authors:  Zhizhou Zhang; Ushasri Varanasi; Robert J Trumbly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A TATA binding protein mutant with increased affinity for DNA directs transcription from a reversed TATA sequence in vivo.

Authors:  J Vaughn Spencer; Karen M Arndt
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Structural and functional analysis of mutations along the crystallographic dimer interface of the yeast TATA binding protein.

Authors:  Haiping Kou; Jordan D Irvin; Kathryn L Huisinga; Madhusmita Mitra; B Franklin Pugh
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  The transcriptional repressor activator protein Rap1p is a direct regulator of TATA-binding protein.

Authors:  Mourad Bendjennat; P Anthony Weil
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.