Literature DB >> 10669506

Contextual influence on orientation discrimination of humans and responses of neurons in V1 of alert monkeys.

W Li1, P Thier, C Wehrhahn.   

Abstract

We studied the effects of various patterns as contextual stimuli on human orientation discrimination, and on responses of neurons in V1 of alert monkeys. When a target line is presented along with various contextual stimuli (masks), human orientation discrimination is impaired. For most V1 neurons, responses elicited by a line in the receptive field (RF) center are suppressed by these contextual patterns. Orientation discrimination thresholds of human observers are elevated slightly when the target line is surrounded by orthogonal lines. For randomly oriented lines, thresholds are elevated further and even more so for lines parallel to the target. Correspondingly, responses of most V1 neurons to a line are suppressed. Although contextual lines inhibit the amplitude of orientation tuning functions of most V1 neurons, they do not systematically alter the tuning width. Elevation of human orientation discrimination thresholds decreases with increasing curvature of masking lines, so does the inhibition of V1 neuronal responses. A mask made of straight lines yields the strongest interference with human orientation discrimination and produces the strongest suppression of neuronal responses. Elevation of human orientation discrimination thresholds is highest when a mask covers only the immediate vicinity of the target line. Increasing the masking area results in less interference. On the contrary, suppression of neuronal responses in V1 increases with increasing mask size. Our data imply that contextual interference observed in human orientation discrimination is in part directly related to contextual inhibition of neuronal activity in V1. However, the finding that interference with orientation discrimination is weaker for larger masks suggests a figure-ground segregation process that is not located in V1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10669506     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.2.941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  31 in total

1.  Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex of macaques.

Authors:  A F Rossi; R Desimone; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Extraclassical receptive field properties of parvocellular, magnocellular, and koniocellular cells in the primate lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Samuel G Solomon; Andrew J R White; Paul R Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Perceptual learning and top-down influences in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Wu Li; Valentin Piëch; Charles D Gilbert
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-05-23       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Target selection in area V4 during a multidimensional visual search task.

Authors:  Tadashi Ogawa; Hidehiko Komatsu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Contextual effects on fine orientation discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Stephanie A Saylor; Lynn A Olzak
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Neurophysiological and simulation studies of striate cortex receptive field maps: the role of intracortical interneuronal interactions.

Authors:  N A Lazareva; K A Saltykov; I A Shevelev; A S Tikhomirov; R V Novikova; D Yu Tsutskiridze
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-07

7.  Feedback signals from cat's area 21a enhance orientation selectivity of area 17 neurons.

Authors:  C Wang; W J Waleszczyk; W Burke; B Dreher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  An outline of functional self-organization in V1: synchrony, STLR and Hebb rules.

Authors:  J J Wright; P D Bourke
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Network model of top-down influences on local gain and contextual interactions in visual cortex.

Authors:  Valentin Piëch; Wu Li; George N Reeke; Charles D Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Segmentation decreases the magnitude of the tilt illusion.

Authors:  Cheng Qiu; Daniel Kersten; Cheryl A Olman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.