| Literature DB >> 10669364 |
J S Montaner1, T Mo, J M Raboud, S Rae, C S Alexander, C Zala, D Rouleau, P R Harrigan.
Abstract
The baseline predictors of poor virologic response (<0.5 log decrease in plasma virus load) were examined in two 1996 pilot trials of combination nucleoside-analogue therapy. One trial examined the addition of hydroxyurea to didanosine therapy; the other examined stavudine-lamivudine in combination. In both, predictors of virologic response included the presence of mutations associated with zidovudine resistance. For hydroxyurea, the odds ratio (OR) of failure to achieve a short-term (4 weeks) virologic response in a bivariate logistic regression model was 30.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-543; P=.02) for use of lower dose hydroxyurea (500 mg/day) and 14.7 (95% CI, 1.1-200; P=.04) for the presence of a zidovudine-related mutation. For the stavudine-lamivudine study, the OR of failure to achieve a virologic response at 4 weeks in a multivariate logistic regression model was 23 (95% CI, 2.7-199; P=.004) for the presence of a mutation at codon 215.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10669364 DOI: 10.1086/315243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Infect Dis ISSN: 0022-1899 Impact factor: 5.226