UNLABELLED: The index of myocardial performance combining systolic and diastolic time intervals (Index) is a useful method, already explained in past studies, that offers new values that have not been widely known among clinical cardiologists. The aim of this study is to obtain from this Index a measurement of the ejection fraction (EF), which is a very well-known value. The study involved 97 patients with myocardial infarction, 55 of whom were studied retrospectively (group A, aged 46-62 years, 50 men) to obtain and test the formula EF = 60 - (34 x Index). The second group (group B, aged 47-63 years, 40 men) included 42 patients who were evaluated prospectively. The EF obtained was compared with that reached through the use of radionuclide angiography (EF-RNA). The Index was obtained through the use of the formula (a - b)/b, where a is the interval between cessation and onset of the mitral inflow, and b is the ejection time. In group A the EF obtained by the Index (EF-Index) was 37.5% +/-.8%, and the EF-RNA was 37.7% +/- 11% (r = 0.76). In group B the EF-Index was 41.6% +/- 7%, and the EF-RNA was 41.2% +/- 10% (r = 0. 75). CONCLUSION: Through the new formula described here it is possible to obtain a reliable measurement of the EF in patients with myocardial infarction, a well-known and extremely useful value, especially for those patients with poor acoustic windows.
UNLABELLED: The index of myocardial performance combining systolic and diastolic time intervals (Index) is a useful method, already explained in past studies, that offers new values that have not been widely known among clinical cardiologists. The aim of this study is to obtain from this Index a measurement of the ejection fraction (EF), which is a very well-known value. The study involved 97 patients with myocardial infarction, 55 of whom were studied retrospectively (group A, aged 46-62 years, 50 men) to obtain and test the formula EF = 60 - (34 x Index). The second group (group B, aged 47-63 years, 40 men) included 42 patients who were evaluated prospectively. The EF obtained was compared with that reached through the use of radionuclide angiography (EF-RNA). The Index was obtained through the use of the formula (a - b)/b, where a is the interval between cessation and onset of the mitral inflow, and b is the ejection time. In group A the EF obtained by the Index (EF-Index) was 37.5% +/-.8%, and the EF-RNA was 37.7% +/- 11% (r = 0.76). In group B the EF-Index was 41.6% +/- 7%, and the EF-RNA was 41.2% +/- 10% (r = 0. 75). CONCLUSION: Through the new formula described here it is possible to obtain a reliable measurement of the EF in patients with myocardial infarction, a well-known and extremely useful value, especially for those patients with poor acoustic windows.