Literature DB >> 10667879

Student performances on Step 1 and Step 2 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination following implementation of a problem-based learning curriculum.

R L Blake1, M C Hosokawa, S L Riley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine students' performances on Step 1 and Step 2 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) following the implementation of a problem-based learning curriculum.
METHOD: Performances on Step 1 of the USMLE for four classes at the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine that completed a new problem-based learning curriculum (1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000) were compared with those of the last two classes to learn in the traditional curriculum (1995 and 1996). Performances on Step 2 of the USMLE for the classes of 1997, 1998, and 1999 were also compared with those of the classes of 1995 and 1996. The authors analyzed matriculation data (GPAs and MCAT scores) for all six classes. They compared all data with those of U.S. and Canadian first-time USMLE takers.
RESULTS: The mean scores were higher on USMLE Step 1 for classes in the problem-based learning curriculum than for classes in the traditional curriculum. The mean scores for Step 2 were above the national mean for classes in the revised curriculum and below the national mean for classes in the traditional curriculum. The admission profiles of these classes were essentially the same before and after the change in curriculum.
CONCLUSIONS: Major PBL revisions of the curriculum did not compromise the performances of medical students on the licensing examinations; in fact, they may have contributed to higher scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10667879     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200001000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  10 in total

1.  Reforming teaching methods by integrating dental theory with clinical practice for dental students.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Xuewei Bi; Yuhe Zhu; Xiaoming Li
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Guidelines for the construction of multiple choice questions tests.

Authors:  Mohammed O Al-Rukban
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2006-09

3.  Comparison of knowledge scores of medical students in problem-based learning and traditional curriculum on public health topics.

Authors:  Erol Gurpinar; Berna Musal; Gazanfer Aksakoglu; Reyhan Ucku
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Medical students' achievement on the Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery/Chirurgery Final Part I and II licensing examination: a comparison of students in problem-based learning, community-based education and service, and conventional curricula in Ghana.

Authors:  Victor Mogre; Anthony Amalba; Mark Saaka; Kwabena Kyei-Aboagye
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-05-08

5.  An Integrated Interactive-Spaced Education Radiology Curriculum for Preclinical Students.

Authors:  Eli Tshibwabwa; Robert Mallin; Madeleine Fraser; Martin Tshibwabwa; Reza Sanii; James Rice; Jenifer Cannon
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2017-05-24

6.  The effectiveness of problem-based learning in pediatric medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yimei Ma; Xiaoxi Lu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Comparison Between Problem-Based Learning and Lecture-Based Learning: Effect on Nursing Students' Immediate Knowledge Retention.

Authors:  Yonatan Solomon
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2020-12-07

8.  Interdisciplinary integration of the CVS module and its effect on faculty and student satisfaction as well as student performance.

Authors:  Nasra N Ayuob; Basem S Eldeek; Lana A Alshawa; Abdulrahman F ALsaba
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Medical Students' Reflections on the Recent Changes to the USMLE Step Exams.

Authors:  Peter T Cangialosi; Brian C Chung; Torin P Thielhelm; Nicholas D Camarda; Dylan S Eiger
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 7.840

10.  How was the intern year?: self and clinical assessment of four cohorts, from two medical curricula.

Authors:  Gillian Laven; Dorothy Keefe; Paul Duggan; Anne Tonkin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.463

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.