Literature DB >> 10667747

Sensory gating in rats: lack of correlation between auditory evoked potential gating and prepulse inhibition.

B A Ellenbroek1, G van Luijtelaar, M Frenken, A R Cools.   

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the possible similarities between two paradigms designed to measure sensory gating: (1) an auditory evoked potential (AEP), called the P50 gating paradigm; and (2) an acoustic startle (ASR), called the prepulse inhibition paradigm. These paradigms show a number of methodological, pharmacological, and neurobiological similarities, and they are both disturbed in patients with schizophrenia. In the first of three experiments, the AEP gating and the ASR gating were measured in rats. Although both AEP and ASR gating could readily be obtained, there appeared to be no correlation between the performance in these two paradigms. This lack of correlation was confirmed using a factor analytical approach, where the AEP gating and the ASR gating parameters were found to load on different factors. In the second experiment, the interstimulus interval in the ASR paradigm was increased to 500 ms (identical to the interstimulus interval of the AEP gating paradigm). This increase reduced the degree of ASR gating, although some gating could still be obtained. Again no correlation was found between AEP and ASR gating, and this was again confirmed by the factorial analysis. In the final experiment, the effects of the dopamine D2/3 agonist 7-OHDPAT were evaluated in both paradigms. This selective agonist dose dependently reduced ASR gating but had no effect on AEP gating. Together, these data strongly suggest that AEP and ASR gating measure two different aspects of information processing and indicate that both paradigms may be important for investigating the neurobiological disturbances observed in patients with psychoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10667747     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Bull        ISSN: 0586-7614            Impact factor:   9.306


  7 in total

1.  Effects of α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists on antipsychotic efficacy in a preclinical mouse model of psychosis.

Authors:  Kathy L Kohlhaas; Robert S Bitner; Murali Gopalakrishnan; Lynne E Rueter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Convergence and divergence in the neurochemical regulation of prepulse inhibition of startle and N40 suppression in rats.

Authors:  Neal R Swerdlow; Mark A Geyer; Jody M Shoemaker; Gregory A Light; David L Braff; Karen E Stevens; Richard Sharp; Michelle Breier; Alaina Neary; Pamela P Auerbach
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Sensory and sensorimotor gating-disruptive effects of apomorphine in Sprague Dawley and Long Evans rats.

Authors:  Michelle R Breier; Brittanni Lewis; Jody M Shoemaker; Gregory A Light; Neal R Swerdlow
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Pre-attentive processing and schizophrenia: animal studies.

Authors:  Bart A Ellenbroek
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  The use of neurophysiological endophenotypes to understand the genetic basis of schizophrenia.

Authors:  David L Braff; Gregory A Light
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.986

6.  Prepulse inhibition of change-related P50m no correlation with P50m gating.

Authors:  Koji Inui; Aki Tsuruhara; Kei Nakagawa; Makoto Nishihara; Minori Kodaira; Eishi Motomura; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-11-01

7.  Genetic Determinants of Gating Functions: Do We Get Closer to Understanding Schizophrenia Etiopathogenesis?

Authors:  Rastislav Rovný; Dominika Besterciová; Igor Riečanský
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.157

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.