Literature DB >> 10667618

A 12-week study comparing moclobemide and sertraline in the treatment of outpatients with atypical depression.

J Søgaard1, R Lane, P Latimer, K Behnke, P E Christiansen, B Nielsen, A V Ravindran, R T Reesal, D P Goodwin.   

Abstract

One hundred and ninety-seven outpatients with atypical depression [Atypical Depression Diagnostic Scale (ADDS) score=4] were randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with sertraline or moclobemide in a multicentre, parallel-group clinical trial. Patients were started on either 50 mg/day sertraline or 300 mg/day moclobemide. If the therapeutic response was not satisfactory after 4 weeks, the dose could be increased to either 100 mg/day sertraline or 450 mg/day moclobemide. Primary efficacy evaluations were the 29-item Hamilton Psychiatric Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) response rate (much or very much improved) at study endpoint. Secondary efficacy evaluations included the ADDS, the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), the Leeds Sleep Scale, and the Battelle Quality of Life Battery (BQOLB). In the analysis of the 172 patient efficacy-evaluable population, there was significant baseline to endpoint improvement in all primary and secondary efficacy assessments after treatment with either sertraline or moclobemide. At the endpoint, the proportion of responders on CGI-I, was 77.5% in the sertraline group and 67.5% in the moclobemide group (p=0.052). The baseline to endpoint mean 29-item HAM-D score decreased from 35.9 to 14.5 in the sertraline group and from 36.3 to 16.1 in the moclobemide group. Sertraline also resulted in a significantly (p < 0.05) greater degree of improvement at the endpoint, compared with moclobemide, in the proportion of remitters on the HAMA (total score < or = 7), ADDS Category IID (Rejection Sensitivity), Leeds Sleep Factor 4 (Integrity of Behaviour Following Awakening), and on three dimensions of the BQOLB (Energy/Vitality, Social Interaction and Life Satisfaction). There were no other significant differences between treatment groups. Overall, both medications were well tolerated. In this study, both sertraline and moclobemide improved the symptoms of atypical depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10667618     DOI: 10.1177/026988119901300412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0269-8811            Impact factor:   4.153


  18 in total

1.  General and comparative efficacy and effectiveness of antidepressants in the acute treatment of depressive disorders: a report by the WPA section of pharmacopsychiatry.

Authors:  Thomas C Baghai; Pierre Blier; David S Baldwin; Michael Bauer; Guy M Goodwin; Kostas N Fountoulakis; Siegfried Kasper; Brian E Leonard; Ulrik F Malt; Dan Stein; Marcio Versiani; Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 2.  Sertraline versus other antidepressive agents for depression.

Authors:  Andrea Cipriani; Teresa La Ferla; Toshi A Furukawa; Alessandra Signoretti; Atsuo Nakagawa; Rachel Churchill; Hugh McGuire; Corrado Barbui
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

3.  Atypical depression.

Authors:  Tanvir Singh; Kristi Williams
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2006-04

Review 4.  Pharmacotherapy to sustain the fully remitted state.

Authors:  Sidney Kennedy; Roger McIntyre; Angelo Fallu; Raymond Lam
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 5.  Atypical depression: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Chi-Un Pae; Haresh Tharwani; David M Marks; Prakash S Masand; Ashwin A Patkar
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.749

6.  The opposite effects of fluvoxamine and sertraline in the treatment of psychotic major depression: a case report.

Authors:  Akira Kishimoto; Ayako Todani; Junko Miura; Tetsuno Kitagaki; Kenji Hashimoto
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 7.  [Core symptoms of depression. Effectiveness of antidepressant therapy].

Authors:  J Damm; D Eser; C Schüle; H-J Möller; R Rupprecht; T C Baghai
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  An open-label, rater-blinded, flexible-dose, 8-week trial of escitalopram in patients with major depressive disorder with atypical features.

Authors:  Chi-Un Pae; Prakash S Masand; Kathleen Peindl; Paolo Mannelli; Changsu Han; David M Marks; Ashwin A Patkar
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008

Review 9.  Fatigue in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: Prevalence, Burden and Pharmacological Approaches to Management.

Authors:  Helia Ghanean; Amanda K Ceniti; Sidney H Kennedy
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 10.  Current place of monoamine oxidase inhibitors in the treatment of depression.

Authors:  Kenneth I Shulman; Nathan Herrmann; Scott E Walker
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.