Literature DB >> 10667513

How much guidewire is too much? Direct measurement of the distance from subclavian and internal jugular vein access sites to the superior vena cava-atrial junction during central venous catheter placement.

R T Andrews1, D A Bova, A C Venbrux.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The introduction of excessive lengths of guidewire during placement of central venous catheters from the internal jugular vein (IJV) or the subclavian vein (SCV) can result in rare but significant complications. To identify a "safe" guidewire insertion length, the authors performed direct intravascular measurement of the distance from these venous access sites to the superior vena cava-atrial junction (CAJ), and evaluated these distances relative to the patients' height, weight, sex, and chest radiographs.
DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized observation.
SETTING: The Interventional Radiology Department of a tertiary care referral hospital. PATIENTS: 100 adults (45 women, 55 men) evaluated during fluoroscopically directed central venous catheter placement.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The distance from the IJV or SCV access site was directly measured using fluoroscopy and an intravascular guidewire. 40 right IJVs, 31 right SCVs, 16 left SCVs, and 13 left IJVs were studied. Comparative measurements from the postprocedure radiograph were made in 20 of these cases. All measurements were correlated with patient sex, height, and weight. The mean distance from all access sites to the superior vena cava-atrial junction was 18.0 cm. The right IJV distance was the shortest, averaging 16 cm. The left SCV distance was the longest, averaging 21.2 cm. Right SCV and left IJV distances were 18.4 and 19.1 cm, respectively, but this difference was not statistically significant. Weight and radiographic measurements did not correlate with the measured vascular distance, although there was a trend toward longer distances in taller patients and males.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient height, weight, and measurements from previous chest radiographs are less reliable in predicting a safe wire length than is the access site selected. In most cases, 18 cm should be considered the upper limit of guidewire introduced during central catheter placement in adults. The guidewires supplied in catheter kits should have lengths correlated to those of the catheters, and should have distance markings printed upon them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10667513     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200001000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  16 in total

1.  Pericardial tamponade: Rare complication of subclavian vein cannulation.

Authors:  Rashmi Datta; Gaurav Purohit; Jyotsna Agrawal; Shalendra Singh
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-07-26

2.  Cannulation of the subclavian vein using real-time ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  Thomas W Davies; Hugh Montgomery; Edward Gilbert-Kawai
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2020-01-23

Review 3.  Inferior vena cava filters: current best practices.

Authors:  Anita Rajasekhar
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Complete heart block during ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization.

Authors:  Iago Jorge; Igor Pietrobom; Aécio Góis
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Wire Placement into the Dural Venous Sinuses during Central Venous Catheter Placement.

Authors:  Aaron Trimble; Nathaniel Ivanick
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Missing the guidewire: an avoidable complication.

Authors:  Hesham R Omar; Ahmed Fathy; Devanand Mangar; Enrico Camporesi
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2010-09-25

7.  Anatomic considerations for central venous cannulation.

Authors:  Michael P Bannon; Stephanie F Heller; Mariela Rivera
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-04-13

8.  Systemic oxygen extraction during exercise at high altitude.

Authors:  D S Martin; A Cobb; P Meale; K Mitchell; M Edsell; M G Mythen; M P W Grocott
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Intracranial entrapment of a haemodialysis catheter guidewire.

Authors:  Natasha Hemicke Langer; Lars Hein; Morten Heiberg Bestle
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-08-25

10.  Unusual but completely avoidable complication during central venous catheterization.

Authors:  Kewal Krishan Gupta; Nitin Nagpal
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2015 May-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.