Literature DB >> 10667500

Accidental removal of endotracheal and nasogastric tubes and intravascular catheters.

M I Carrión1, D Ayuso, M Marcos, M Paz Robles, M A de la Cal, I Alía, A Esteban.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the rates of accidental removal of endotracheal tubes, nasogastric tubes, central venous catheters, and arterial catheters. To assess the efficacy of corrective measures aimed at reducing the accidental removal of these devices.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational, and interventional study.
SETTING: Eighteen-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit of a 650-bed tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to the intensive care unit who had any of the following devices in place for more than 24 hrs: endotracheal tube, nasogastric tube, central venous catheter, arterial catheter. MEASUREMENTS AND
INTERVENTIONS: Data were collected on the date of placement of tubes and catheters, position of vascular catheters, date of removal, and reason for removal. The study involved three consecutive 6-month periods. At the end of the first and the second periods, information about rates of accidental removal was provided to the physicians and nurses. In addition, the personnel were instructed to be more vigilant and specific measures aimed at reducing the accidental removal were introduced. MAIN
RESULTS: In the first period, 289 endotracheal tubes were placed and 13.1% (24.7 per 1000 days) were removed accidentally. In the second and third periods, 17.1% (25.5 per 1000 days) and 11.4% (15.1 per 1000 days) were removed accidentally, respectively. In the first period, 368 nasogastric tubes were placed and 41% (73.9 per 1000 days) were removed accidentally. In both the second and the third period, a significant reduction in the rate of accidental removal was observed (32.4% or 41.2 per 1000 days and 25.8% or 29.8 per 1000 days, respectively). A significant decrease was observed in the rates of accidental removal of central venous catheters from 7.5% (12.4 per 1000 days) in the first period to 3.6% (5.4 per 1000 days) in the second period. The rate of arterial catheters accidentally removed expressed according to the time at risk significantly decreased from 46.5 per 1000 days in the first period to 19.1 per 1000 days in the second period and 25.3 per 1000 days in the third period.
CONCLUSIONS: The information provided by the rates of accidental removal expressed by patient-days is helpful to compare results obtained in populations with different times of follow-up. Education of medical personnel and limiting upper-extremity access to within 20 cm from any catheter or tube resulted in a significant reduction of patient-related removal of tubes and catheters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10667500     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200001000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  13 in total

1.  Comparison and agreement between the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale in evaluating patients' eligibility for delirium assessment in the ICU.

Authors:  Babar A Khan; Oscar Guzman; Noll L Campbell; Todd Walroth; Jason L Tricker; Siu L Hui; Anthony Perkins; Mohammed Zawahiri; John D Buckley; Mark O Farber; E Wesley Ely; Malaz A Boustani
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Critical care issues in the early management of severe trauma.

Authors:  Alberto Garcia
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Care erosion in sedation assessment: A prospective comparison of usual care Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale assessment with protocolized assessment for medical intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Christopher Charles Anderson; Jessica L Johnson; Bennett P deBoisblanc; Sarah E Jolley
Journal:  J Nurs Manag       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  [Tolerance of endotracheal tubes in patients on mechanical ventilation].

Authors:  P Nydahl; C Hermes; R Dubb; A Kaltwasser; D Schuchhardt
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  Accidental removal of dialysis central venous catheter inserted for blood purification therapy: a single-center study.

Authors:  Shigeki Kojima; Yuhji Marui; Yugo Shibagaki; Tsutomu Sakurada
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  Severe agitation among ventilated medical intensive care unit patients: frequency, characteristics and outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffery C Woods; Lorraine C Mion; Jason T Connor; Florence Viray; Lisa Jahan; Cecilia Huber; Renee McHugh; Jeffrey P Gonzales; James K Stoller; Alejandro C Arroliga
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-14       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Defining sedation-related adverse events in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Mary Jo C Grant; Michele C Balas; Martha A Q Curley
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.210

8.  Unplanned extubation in the ICU: a marker of quality assurance of mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Óscar Peñuelas; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Andrés Esteban
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Accidental catheter removal in critically ill patients: a prospective and observational study.

Authors:  Leonardo Lorente; María S Huidobro; María M Martín; Alejandro Jiménez; María L Mora
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Evaluating and monitoring analgesia and sedation in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Curtis N Sessler; Mary Jo Grap; Michael Ae Ramsay
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.