Literature DB >> 10664781

Perceptual and linguistic interactions in speeded classification: tests of the semantic coding hypothesis.

G Martino1, L E Marks.   

Abstract

We tested the semantic coding hypothesis, which states that cross-modal interactions observed in speeded classification tasks arise after perceptual information is recoded into an abstract format common to perceptual and linguistic systems. Using a speeded classification task, we first confirmed the presence of congruence interactions between auditory pitch and visual lightness and observed Garner-type interference with nonlinguistic (perceptual) stimuli (low-frequency and high-frequency tones, black and white squares). Subsequently, we found that modifying the visual stimuli by (a) making them lexical (related words) or (b) reducing their compactness or figural 'goodness' altered congruence effects and Garner interference. The results are consistent with the semantic coding hypothesis, but only in part, and suggest the need for additional assumptions regarding the role of perceptual organization in cross-modal dimensional interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10664781     DOI: 10.1068/p2866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  17 in total

1.  Item-specific congruency effects in nonverbal auditory Stroop.

Authors:  Launa C Leboe; Todd A Mondor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-25

Review 2.  Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes.

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Anne-Sylvie Crisinel; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

Review 3.  Why we are not all synesthetes (not even weakly so).

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

Review 4.  Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association.

Authors:  David M Sidhu; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

5.  A multi-sensory code for emotional arousal.

Authors:  Beau Sievers; Caitlyn Lee; William Haslett; Thalia Wheatley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Anne Treisman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Audio-visual crossmodal correspondences in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  A T Korzeniowska; H Root-Gutteridge; J Simner; D Reby
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Crossmodal correspondences: Innate or learned?

Authors:  Charles Spence; Ophelia Deroy
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-05-09

9.  Crossmodal interactions during affective picture processing.

Authors:  Vera Ferrari; Serena Mastria; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fast lemons and sour boulders: Testing crossmodal correspondences using an internet-based testing methodology.

Authors:  Andy T Woods; Charles Spence; Natalie Butcher; Ophelia Deroy
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.