Literature DB >> 10664318

Comparison between measured and predicted resting metabolic rate in moderately active adolescents.

I Bertini, A Puijia, G Testolin, C Testolin.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to check the validity of predictive equations for the calculation of resting metabolic rate (RMR) in moderately active adolescents. The RMR was measured in a sample of 25 healthy 15.5-18.2-year-old boys practicing soccer. The RMR was assessed by indirect calorimetry for 30 min following an overnight fast. Body composition was estimated from skinfold thickness measurements. Among the available equations to predict RMR, we decided to use those a of Molnar et al., Harris-Benedict, Schofield, and Cunningham. Measured and predicted values were compared by means of a one-way ANOVA. Also the Bland-Altman test was performed in order to evaluate the accuracy of the prediction equations compared to the measured value. The measured RMR was found to be 1834 +/- 160 kcal/day (mean +/- SD), while the Molnar et al., Schofield, Harris-Benedict, and Cunningham predicted values were 1707 +/- 78, 1866 +/- 89, 1779 +/- 84 and 1830 +/- 87 kcal/day, respectively. On average, compared to the measured values only the Molnar et al. equation differed significantly. On an individual basis, all the equations demonstrated considerable variability between measured and predicted RMRs. The predicted values also differed significantly. As regards the moderately active subjects (16-18 years old), we recommend the use of the Schofield equation, based on simple anthropometric parameters and also that of Cunningham, even if the estimation or measurement of fat-free mass may be cumbersome for everyday pediatric use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10664318     DOI: 10.1007/s005920050157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Diabetol        ISSN: 0940-5429            Impact factor:   4.280


  7 in total

1.  Nutritional Intake of Young Italian High-Level Soccer Players: Under-Reporting is the Essential Outcome.

Authors:  Riccardo Caccialanza; Barbara Cameletti; Gianfranco Cavallaro
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  ESTIMATING BASAL ENERGY EXPENDITURE IN LIVER TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS: THE VALUE OF THE HARRIS-BENEDICT EQUATION.

Authors:  Andressa S Pinto; Marcio F Chedid; Léa T Guerra; Mario R Álvares-DA-Silva; Alexandre de Araújo; Luciano S Guimarães; Ian Leipnitz; Aljamir D Chedid; Cleber R P Kruel; Tomaz J M Grezzana-Filho; Cleber D P Kruel
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

3.  Characteristics of high and low energy reporting teenagers and their relationship to low energy reporting mothers.

Authors:  Karin Vågstrand; Anna Karin Lindroos; Yvonne Linné
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.022

4.  Energy expenditure of rugby players during a 14-day in-season period, measured using doubly labelled water.

Authors:  Deborah R Smith; R F G J King; L C Duckworth; L Sutton; T Preston; J P O'Hara; B Jones
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Accuracy of predictive equations for resting metabolic rate in Korean athletic and non-athletic adolescents.

Authors:  Jae-Hee Kim; Myung-Hee Kim; Gwi-Sun Kim; Ji-Sun Park; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 1.926

6.  Metabolic Equivalent in Adolescents, Active Adults and Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Katarina Melzer; Juliane Heydenreich; Yves Schutz; Anne Renaud; Bengt Kayser; Urs Mäder
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Comparing nutrient intake and body weight status amongst adolescent substance users, institutionalised abstainers and never users.

Authors:  Tony Ka-Chun Yung; Joseph Tak-Fai Lau
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.894

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.