Literature DB >> 10663892

Detection of colorectal neoplasms by the highly sensitive hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex in feces.

A Sieg1, C Thoms, K Lüthgens, M R John, H Schmidt-Gayk.   

Abstract

Screening for fecal occult blood by means of guaiac tests has an unsatisfactory sensitivity for the detection of colorectal neoplasms. The immunological determination of human hemoglobin in feces has a higher sensitivity and specificity, but hemoglobin is degraded during its transport through the gastrointestinal tract. We compared the hemoglobin test to a newly developed immuno-chemiluminometric (ILMA) assay for quantifying the hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex in feces which shows high stability against degradation. From each of 621 patients with gastrointestinal complaints before scheduled colonoscopy we collected two 1-ml samples from a single stool; there were no dietary restrictions. The sensitivity for detecting colorectal carcinomas proved 87% with hemoglobin. With the hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex it was 87% at a cutoff level of 1.5 microg/g feces, 83% at 2.0 microg/g feces, and 78% at 2.5 and 3.0 microg/g feces. The sensitivity for detecting large adenomatous polyps was 54% with hemoglobin, 76% with the hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex at a cutoff point of 1.5 microg/g feces, 73% with the hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex at 2.0 and 2.5 microg/g feces, and 65% with the hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex at 3.0 microg/g feces. The optimal cutoff point for the hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex was estimated to be 2.0 microg/g stool. The specificity for hemoglobin (99%) was significantly higher than that for the hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex at 2.0 microg/g feces (96%). Immunological determination of the hemoglobin-haptoglobin complex in feces has a comparable sensitivity as the fecal hemoglobin assay for colorectal carcinomas and a significantly higher sensitivity for adenomatous polyps but a significantly lower specificity. Its use for colorectal cancer prevention is currently being evaluated in a screening study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10663892     DOI: 10.1007/s003840050226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  5 in total

1.  Role of faecal occult bloods in the diagnosis of iron deficiency anaemia.

Authors:  A T M Dilshad Chowdhury; Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton; Andrew Davis; David Massey; Patrick Goggin
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-27

Review 2.  Value of symptoms and additional diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Petra Jellema; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; David J Bruinvels; Christian D Mallen; Stijn J B van Weyenberg; Chris J Mulder; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-31

3.  Fecal Tests: From Blood to Molecular Markers.

Authors:  Graeme P Young; Linda J W Bosch
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2011-01-18

4.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Five Different Fecal Markers for the Detection of Precancerous and Cancerous Lesions of the Colorectum.

Authors:  Mariann Rutka; Renáta Bor; Anita Bálint; Anna Fábián; Ágnes Milassin; Ferenc Nagy; Zoltán Szepes; Mónika Szűcs; László Tiszlavicz; Klaudia Farkas; Tamás Molnár
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.711

5.  Proteins in stool as biomarkers for non-invasive detection of colorectal adenomas with high risk of progression.

Authors:  Malgorzata A Komor; Linda Jw Bosch; Veerle Mh Coupé; Christian Rausch; Thang V Pham; Sander R Piersma; Sandra Mongera; Chris Jj Mulder; Evelien Dekker; Ernst J Kuipers; Mark A van de Wiel; Beatriz Carvalho; Remond Ja Fijneman; Connie R Jimenez; Gerrit A Meijer; Meike de Wit
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 7.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.