Literature DB >> 10663754

Musculoskeletal MRI: dedicated systems.

C Masciocchi1, A Barile, L Satragno.   

Abstract

The "dedicated" MRI units have characteristics of high diagnostic accuracy and lower installation and management costs as compared with whole-body systems. The dedicated MRI units are easy to install. The low weight allows their installation also under unfavorable circumstances. In a dedicated system cost-effectiveness and ease of installation must be accompanied by the capability of providing high-quality images. In our experience, the high number of examinations performed, the most part of which provided with the surgical controls, allowed an accurate evaluation of the diagnostic potentialities of the dedicated magnet. We were not able to perform the examinations in only 3 % of cases due to the physical shape of the patient and the clinical condition of the patient which may hinder the correct positioning of the limb. The overlapping of the diagnostic accuracy of the E-scan and Artoscan units in the study of the lower limbs, compared with whole-body units and surgery, prompted us to exploit the potentialities of the E-Scan in the study of the shoulder. We had a good correlation between E-Scan, whole-body units, and surgical findings, which confirmed the high diagnostic accuracy of the dedicated system. In conclusion, in our experience carried out in the musculoskeletal system, the dedicated magnets showed promising results. Their diagnostic reliability and utility was comparable to that obtained from conventional units operating at higher magnetic fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10663754     DOI: 10.1007/s003300050041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  4 in total

1.  Short tau inversion recovery and proton density-weighted fat suppressed sequences for the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee with a 1.0 T dedicated extremity MRI: development of a time-efficient sequence protocol.

Authors:  Frank W Roemer; Ali Guermazi; John A Lynch; Charles G Peterfy; Michael C Nevitt; Nita Webb; Jing Li; Andreas Mohr; Harry K Genant; David T Felson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance tomography of the knee joint.

Authors:  Stefan Puig; Yojena Chittazhathu Kurian Kuruvilla; Lukas Ebner; Gottfried Endel
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  A comparison of dedicated 1.0 T extremity MRI vs large-bore 1.5 T MRI for semiquantitative whole organ assessment of osteoarthritis: the MOST study.

Authors:  F W Roemer; J A Lynch; J Niu; Y Zhang; M D Crema; I Tolstykh; G Y El-Khoury; D T Felson; C E Lewis; M C Nevitt; A Guermazi
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Diagnosis of acute fractures of the extremities: comparison of low-field MRI and conventional radiography.

Authors:  Philipp Remplik; Axel Stäbler; Thomas Merl; Frank Roemer; Klaus Bohndorf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.