B A Ellenbroek1, F Sluyter, A R Cools. 1. Department of Psychoneuropharmacology, University of Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. A.Ellebroek@pnf.kun.nl
Abstract
RATIONALE: There is ample evidence that rats show large individual differences in their response to dopaminergic drugs, such as apomorphine. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of genetic and (early) environmental factors in determining the adult susceptibility to apomorphine. Four experiments were performed: In experiment 1, the original selective breeding of rats for apomorphine susceptibility (leading to APO-SUS and APO-UNSUS rats) was extended and replicated in an independent group of Wistar rats. In experiment 2, APO-SUS males were cross-bred with APO-UNSUS females and vice versa. In experiment 3 APO-SUS litters were cross-fostered to APO-UNSUS mothers or infostered to unknown APO-SUS mothers and vice versa. In experiment 4 APO-SUS and APO-UNSUS rats were maternally deprived on postnatal day 9, for a single 24-h period. METHODS: Adult rats were subcutaneously injected with 1.5 mg/kg apomorphine and their gnawing response was automatically recorded in a gnawing box for 45 min. RESULTS: In experiment 1, the original breeding was extended up to generation 24, leading to a strong and consistent difference in gnawing scores. The replication experiment also succeeded in differentiating APO-SUS and APO-UNSUS. The cross breeding experiments showed that the APO-SUS/UNSUS offspring showed gnawing scores in between the original selection lines. Cross-fostering APO-SUS with APO-UNSUS significantly reduced the gnawing response in the offspring, whereas it did not affect the gnawing score in the APO-UNSUS animals. Maternal deprivation had the opposite effect: increase in gnawing response in APO-UNSUS, with no effect in APO-SUS. CONCLUSION: The results show a clear-cut contribution of both genetic and early environmental factors to the susceptibility of apomorphine.
RATIONALE: There is ample evidence that rats show large individual differences in their response to dopaminergic drugs, such as apomorphine. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of genetic and (early) environmental factors in determining the adult susceptibility to apomorphine. Four experiments were performed: In experiment 1, the original selective breeding of rats for apomorphine susceptibility (leading to APO-SUS and APO-UNSUS rats) was extended and replicated in an independent group of Wistar rats. In experiment 2, APO-SUS males were cross-bred with APO-UNSUS females and vice versa. In experiment 3 APO-SUS litters were cross-fostered to APO-UNSUS mothers or infostered to unknown APO-SUS mothers and vice versa. In experiment 4 APO-SUS and APO-UNSUS rats were maternally deprived on postnatal day 9, for a single 24-h period. METHODS: Adult rats were subcutaneously injected with 1.5 mg/kg apomorphine and their gnawing response was automatically recorded in a gnawing box for 45 min. RESULTS: In experiment 1, the original breeding was extended up to generation 24, leading to a strong and consistent difference in gnawing scores. The replication experiment also succeeded in differentiating APO-SUS and APO-UNSUS. The cross breeding experiments showed that the APO-SUS/UNSUS offspring showed gnawing scores in between the original selection lines. Cross-fostering APO-SUS with APO-UNSUS significantly reduced the gnawing response in the offspring, whereas it did not affect the gnawing score in the APO-UNSUS animals. Maternal deprivation had the opposite effect: increase in gnawing response in APO-UNSUS, with no effect in APO-SUS. CONCLUSION: The results show a clear-cut contribution of both genetic and early environmental factors to the susceptibility of apomorphine.
Authors: Nikolaos P Daskalakis; Rosemary C Bagot; Karen J Parker; Christiaan H Vinkers; E R de Kloet Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2013-07-07 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Martine C J van der Elst; Yvette S Wunderink; Bart A Ellenbroek; Alexander R Cools Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2006-10-10 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Ruben W M van Vugt; Francisca Meyer; Josephus A van Hulten; Jeroen Vernooij; Alexander R Cools; Michel M M Verheij; Gerard J M Martens Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2014-08-11 Impact factor: 3.558
Authors: Karen M J van Loo; Tim Dejaegere; Martine van Zweeden; Jessica E van Schijndel; Cisca Wijmenga; Mieke D Trip; Gerard J M Martens Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-11-06 Impact factor: 3.240