Literature DB >> 10663425

Blockade of muscarinic, rather than nicotinic, receptors impairs attention, but does not interact with serotonin depletion.

S Ruotsalainen1, R Miettinen, E MacDonald, E Koivisto, J Sirviö.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: The cholinergic system is considered to be essential for attention and the degeneration of the cholinergic system in Alzheimer's disease (AD) correlates with the cognitive decline seen in AD patients. The serotonergic system also degenerates in AD, but its role in the modulation of cognitive functions, especially attention, is somewhat unclear.
OBJECTIVES: The present study investigated possible differences between cholinergic muscarinic and nicotinic receptor mediated mechanisms, the role of serotonin (5-HT) and the interaction between the cholinergic and serotonergic systems in the modulation of attention and response control.
METHODS: The influences of cholinergic receptor blockade and 5-HT lesions on the performance of rats in the five-choice serial reaction time task were assessed. The 5-HT lesions were neurochemically verified.
RESULTS: The neurochemical analysis indicated that the levels of 5-HT and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid were reduced quite specifically in the hippocampi, parieto-occipital and frontal cortices, and in the striatum of both p-chloroamphetamine (pCA) and 5, 7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT) lesioned rats. The behavioural results showed that the pCA lesion caused a transient increase in impulsivity whereas the 5,7-DHT lesion temporarily reduced the motor activity and slightly impaired choice accuracy. Furthermore, the blockade of central muscarinic receptors by scopolamine (0.075 and 0. 150 mg/kg), but not nicotinic receptors by mecamylamine (1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg), impaired the choice accuracy, whereas the blockade of both muscarinic and nicotinic receptors interfered with motor activity, though possibly via peripheral mechanisms. Interestingly, mecamylamine (3.0 mg/kg) reduced impulsivity, whereas scopolamine slightly increased it. Serotonergic lesions did not make the rats more susceptible to the effects of cholinolytics on choice accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: 5-HT system is not essential for the modulation of attention, but it is important in the modulation of response control. Central muscarinic receptors are important in the modulation of attention, whereas central nicotinic receptors may be more essential in response control. The results do not support there being an interaction between the serotonergic and the cholinergic systems in the modulation of attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10663425     DOI: 10.1007/s002130050032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  10 in total

Review 1.  Nicotinic effects on cognitive function: behavioral characterization, pharmacological specification, and anatomic localization.

Authors:  Edward D Levin; F Joseph McClernon; Amir H Rezvani
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Task demands dissociate the effects of muscarinic M1 receptor blockade and protein kinase C inhibition on attentional performance in rats.

Authors:  Andrea M Robinson; David F Mangini; Joshua A Burk
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.153

3.  Effects of nicotine and mecamylamine on cognition in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Simon N Katner; Sophia A Davis; Amber J Kirsten; Michael A Taffe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Complex relationships of nicotinic receptor actions and cognitive functions.

Authors:  Edward D Levin
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.858

5.  Methamphetamine-, d-Amphetamine-, and p-Chloroamphetamine-Induced Neurotoxicity Differentially Effect Impulsive Responding on the Stop-Signal Task in Rats.

Authors:  Teri M Furlong; Lee S Leavitt; Kristen A Keefe; Jong-Hyun Son
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.911

6.  Cholinergic control of visual categorization in macaques.

Authors:  Nikolaos C Aggelopoulos; Stefanie Liebe; Nikos K Logothetis; Gregor Rainer
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 7.  Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in attention circuitry: the role of layer VI neurons of prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Eliane Proulx; Matthew Piva; Michael K Tian; Craig D C Bailey; Evelyn K Lambe
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Nicotine increases impulsivity and decreases willingness to exert cognitive effort despite improving attention in "slacker" rats: insights into cholinergic regulation of cost/benefit decision making.

Authors:  Jay G Hosking; Fred C W Lam; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Systemic injection of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist mecamylamine affects licking, eyelid size, and locomotor and autonomic activities but not temporal prediction in male mice.

Authors:  Shohei Kaneko; Koji Toda; Yasuyuki Niki; Kota Yamada; Daiki Nasukawa; Yusuke Ujihara
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.399

Review 10.  Convergent pharmacological mechanisms in impulsivity and addiction: insights from rodent models.

Authors:  B Jupp; J W Dalley
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 8.739

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.