Literature DB >> 10660881

Relative distribution of synapses in the A-laminae of the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat.

S C Van Horn1, A Erişir, S M Sherman.   

Abstract

Previous electron microscopic studies of synaptic terminal distributions in the lateral geniculate nucleus have been flawed by potential sampling biases favoring larger synapses. We have thus re-investigated this in the geniculate A-laminae of the cat with an algorithm to correct this sampling bias. We used serial reconstructions with the electron microscope to determine the size of each terminal and synaptic type. We observed that RL (retinal) terminals are largest, F (local, GABAergic, inhibitory) terminals are intermediate in size, and RS (cortical and brainstem) terminals are smallest. We also found that synapses from RL terminals are largest, and thus most oversampled, and we used synaptic size data to correct for sampling errors. Doing so, we found that the relative synaptic percentages overall are 11.7% for RL terminals, 27.5% for F, and 60.8% for RS. Furthermore, we distinguished between relay cells and interneurons with post-embedding immunocytochemistry for GABA (relay cells are GABA negative and interneurons are GABA positive). Onto relay cells, RL terminals contributed 7.1%, F terminals contributed 30.9%, and RS terminals contributed 62.0%. Onto interneurons, RL terminals contributed 48.7%, F terminals contributed 24.4%, and RS terminals contributed 26.9%. We also found that RL terminals included many more separate synaptic contact zones (9.1 +/- 1.6) than did F terminals (2.6 +/- 0.2) or RS terminals (1.02 +/- 0.02). We used these data plus the calculation of overall percentages of each synaptic type to compute the relative percentage of each terminal type in the neuropil: RL terminals represent 1.8%, F terminals represent 14.5%, and RS terminals represent 83.7%. We argue that this relative synaptic paucity is typical for driver inputs (from retina), whereas modulator inputs (all others) require many more synapses to achieve their function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10660881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  71 in total

1.  Completing the corticofugal loop: a visual role for the corticogeniculate type 1 metabotropic glutamate receptor.

Authors:  Casto Rivadulla; Luis M Martínez; Carmen Varela; Javier Cudeiro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effects of activation of the histaminergic tuberomammillary nucleus on visual responses of neurons in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Daniel J Uhlrich; Karen A Manning; Jin-Tang Xue
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Recordings, behaviour and models related to corticothalamic feedback.

Authors:  G L Gerstein; K L Kirkland; P G Musial; S K Talwar
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Corticothalamic interactions in the transfer of visual information.

Authors:  Adam M Sillito; Helen E Jones
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  The role of the thalamus in the flow of information to the cortex.

Authors:  S Murray Sherman; R W Guillery
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Decline of the critical period of visual plasticity is concurrent with the reduction of NR2B subunit of the synaptic NMDA receptor in layer 4.

Authors:  Alev Erisir; Janna L Harris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Quantitative analyses of principal and secondary compound parieto-occipital feedback pathways in cat.

Authors:  Bertram R Payne; Stephen G Lomber
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Hyperpolarisation rectification in cat lateral geniculate neurons modulated by intact corticothalamic projections.

Authors:  D A Nita; M Steriade; F Amzica
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  Complex receptive fields in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Luis M Martinez; Jose-Manuel Alonso
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.519

10.  A corticothalamic switch: controlling the thalamus with dynamic synapses.

Authors:  Shane R Crandall; Scott J Cruikshank; Barry W Connors
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.