Literature DB >> 10660847

Changing use of intensive care for hematological patients: the example of multiple myeloma.

E Azoulay1, C Recher, C Alberti, L Soufir, G Leleu, J R Le Gall, J P Fermand, B Schlemmer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intensivists generally view patients with hematological malignancies as poor candidates for intensive care. Nevertheless, hematologists have recently developed more aggressive treatment protocols capable of achieving prolonged complete remissions in many of these patients. This change mandates a reappraisal of indications for ICU admission in each type of hematological disease. Improved knowledge of the prognosis is of assistance in making treatment decisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 75 myeloma patients consecutively admitted to our ICU between 1992 and 1998 were reviewed retrospectively and predictors of 30-day mortality were identified using stepwise logistic regression.
RESULTS: The median age was 56 years (37-84). Chronic health status (Knaus scale) was C or D in 39 cases. Fifty-five patients (73%) had stage III disease and 17 had a complete or partial remission. Autologous bone marrow transplantation had been performed in 28 patients (37%). ICU admission occurred between 1992 and 1995 in 41 patients (54.7%), and between 1996 and 1998 in 34 patients (45.3%). The median SAPS II and LOD scores were 60 (23-107) and 7 (0-21), respectively. Reasons for ICU admission were acute respiratory failure in 39 patients (52%) and shock in 31 (41%). Forty-six patients (61%) required mechanical ventilation. Fifty patients (66%) received vasopressors and 24 dialysis. Thirty-day mortality was 57%. Only five parameters were independently associated with 30-day mortality in the multivariate model: female gender (OR = 5.12), mechanical ventilation (OR = 16.7) and use of vasopressor agents (OR = 5.67) were associated with a higher mortality rate, whereas disease remission (OR = 0.16) and ICU admission between 1996 and 1998 (OR = 0.09) were associated with a lower one.
CONCLUSION: The prognosis for myeloma patients in the ICU is improving over time. This may reflect either recent therapeutic changes in hematological departments and ICUs or changes in patient selection for ICU admission. Hematologists and intensivists should work closely together to select hematological patients likely to benefit from ICU admission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10660847     DOI: 10.1007/s001340051087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  38 in total

1.  Prognostic factors for intensive care unit admission, intensive care outcome, and post-intensive care survival in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a single center experience.

Authors:  Peter Schellongowski; Thomas Staudinger; Michael Kundi; Klaus Laczika; Gottfried J Locker; Andja Bojic; Oliver Robak; Valentin Fuhrmann; Ulrich Jäger; Peter Valent; Wolfgang R Sperr
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  The intensive care support of patients with malignancy: do everything that can be done.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Bekele Afessa
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Diagnostic strategy in cancer patients with acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Benoît Schlemmer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-04-29       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Can we still refuse ICU admission of patients with hematological malignancies?

Authors:  Frédéric Pène; Márcio Soares
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Outcome in severely ill patients with hematological malignancies who received intravenous chemotherapy in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Dominique D Benoit; Pieter O Depuydt; Koenraad H Vandewoude; Fritz C Offner; Tom Boterberg; Carole A De Cock; Lucien A Noens; Ann M Janssens; Johan M Decruyenaere
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  [Hematological-oncological intensive care patients : Treatment without borders].

Authors:  M Kochanek; A Shimabukuro-Vornhagen; B Böll
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 0.840

7.  Continued survival gains in recent years among critically ill myeloma patients.

Authors:  Vincent Peigne; Katerina Rusinová; Lionel Karlin; Michael Darmon; Jean-Paul Fermand; Benoît Schlemmer; Elie Azoulay
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome during neutropenia recovery in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Chin Kook Rhee; Ji Young Kang; Yong Hyun Kim; Jin Woo Kim; Hyung Kyu Yoon; Seok Chan Kim; Soon Suk Kwon; Young Kyoon Kim; Kwan Hyung Kim; Hwa Sik Moon; Sung Hak Park; Hee Je Kim; Seok Lee; Jeong Sup Song
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  [Chronic critically ill patients from the perspective of hematologists/oncologists].

Authors:  T Staudinger; P Schellongowski
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 0.840

10.  Admission factors associated with hospital mortality in patients with haematological malignancy admitted to UK adult, general critical care units: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database.

Authors:  Peter A Hampshire; Catherine A Welch; Lawrence A McCrossan; Katharine Francis; David A Harrison
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.