Literature DB >> 10660240

Evaluation of efficacy and plasma concentrations of ropivacaine in continuous axillary brachial plexus block: high dose for surgical anesthesia and low dose for postoperative analgesia.

M H Salonen1, J Haasio, M Bachmann, M Xu, P H Rosenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ropivacaine is a potent local anesthetic that, experimentally at low concentrations, produces an effective block of pain conducting nerve fibers. Therefore, it was hypothesized that 0.1% and 0.2% ropivacaine would provide clinically adequate postoperative analgesia in continuous axillary plexus block.
METHODS: Sixty patients (ASA I-II) scheduled for elective hand or forearm surgery received 5 mg/kg of 0.75% ropivacaine for axillary block using nerve stimulator technique. One hour later, in random order, a continuous infusion of either 0.1% ropivacaine (0.125 mg/kg/h), 0.2% ropivacaine (0.25 mg/kg/h) or saline 6 to 11 mL/h was started.
RESULTS: The mean total ropivacaine dose for the surgical block was 5.1 to 5.2 mg/kg with the supplementation. All patients were pain free for the first 12 to 15 hours after the block. The need for postoperative analgesics during the infusion was similar in all groups. After the initial block, the maximum plasma concentrations (mean 2.5 microg/mL) were measured at 45 or 60 minutes after injection. The highest individual plasma concentration was 4.2 microg/mL. Despite the high venous peak concentration, no toxic reactions were observed. The mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was 2.2+/-0.5 microg/mL for saline, 2.6+/-0.8 microg/mL for 0.1% ropivacaine, and 2.6+/-0.7 microg/mL for 0.2% ropivacaine. During the continuous infusion of 24 hours, the ropivacaine concentration declined steadily.
CONCLUSIONS: Ropivacaine is safe and effective for axillary brachial plexus block. The continuous infusion of 0.1% or 0.2% ropivacaine was no more beneficial than an infusion of saline in relieving postoperative pain in patients having elective hand surgery. None of the infusions were sufficient to adequately treat the patients' pain without the addition of adjunct agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10660240     DOI: 10.1016/s1098-7339(00)80010-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  8 in total

1.  Continuous femoral nerve blocks: decreasing local anesthetic concentration to minimize quadriceps femoris weakness.

Authors:  Maria Bauer; Lu Wang; Olusegun K Onibonoje; Chad Parrett; Daniel I Sessler; Loran Mounir-Soliman; Sherif Zaky; Viktor Krebs; Leonard T Buller; Michael C Donohue; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Anesthetic efficacy of different ropivacaine concentrations for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  Eman El-Sharrawy; John A Yagiela
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

Review 3.  Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph M Neal; J C Gerancher; James R Hebl; Brian M Ilfeld; Colin J L McCartney; Carlo D Franco; Quinn H Hogan
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

4.  Revision of loop colostomy under regional anaesthesia and sedation.

Authors:  Oriana Ng; Sze Ying Thong; Claramae Shulyn Chia; Melissa Ching Ching Teo
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 5.  Continuous peripheral nerve blocks.

Authors:  Richard C Shinaman; Sean Mackey
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2005-02

6.  Ropivacaine-induced toxicity with overdose suspected after axillary brachial plexus block.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Kimura; Yasuhiro Kamada; Akira Kimura; Kaori Orimo
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  The role of continuous peripheral nerve blocks.

Authors:  José Aguirre; Alicia Del Moral; Irina Cobo; Alain Borgeat; Stephan Blumenthal
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-06-18

8.  Local Anesthetic Plasma Concentrations as a Valuable Tool to Confirm the Diagnosis of Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity? A Report of 10 Years of Experience.

Authors:  Camille Riff; Axel Le Caloch; Julien Dupouey; Laurent Allanioux; Marc Leone; Olivier Blin; Aurélie Bourgoin; Romain Guilhaumou
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 6.321

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.