OBJECT: The authors analyzed their series of carotid endarterectomies (CEAs), which were performed after administration of either a general or regional anesthetic, to determine whether the choice of anesthetic affected patients' clinical outcomes and length of hospital stay. METHODS: A series of 803 consecutive CEAs performed between July 1990 and February 1999 was reviewed. Cases were analyzed for patient demographics, comorbid medical states, and perioperative complications. Contingency-table statistical analysis was used to compare the incidence of comorbid medical states and perioperative complications between patients who underwent CEA in which either a regional or general anesthetic was used. Student's t-test was used to compare the length of hospital stay and mean patient age. A regional anesthetic was used for 632 CEAs, and a general anesthetic was used for 171 operations. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences in demographics or comorbid medical states. The incidence of perioperative stroke and death did not differ significantly between the regional (2.7%) and the general anesthetic groups (2.3%). However, the incidence of nonneurological, nonfatal complications was significantly less in the regional anesthetic (1.6%) than in the general anesthetic group (14.6%, p<0.0001). Patients undergoing CEA in which a regional anesthetic was used had a significantly lower incidence of cardiopulmonary complications (myocardial infarction and postoperative intubation), cervical complications (neck hematomas and cranial nerve injuries), and urological complications (urinary retention) than patients who underwent surgery after receiving a general anesthetic. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing CEA in which a regional anesthetic was used had significantly fewer nonneurological, nonfatal complications, particularly cardiopulmonary complications, than similar patients surgically treated after induction of general anesthesia.
OBJECT: The authors analyzed their series of carotid endarterectomies (CEAs), which were performed after administration of either a general or regional anesthetic, to determine whether the choice of anesthetic affected patients' clinical outcomes and length of hospital stay. METHODS: A series of 803 consecutive CEAs performed between July 1990 and February 1999 was reviewed. Cases were analyzed for patient demographics, comorbid medical states, and perioperative complications. Contingency-table statistical analysis was used to compare the incidence of comorbid medical states and perioperative complications between patients who underwent CEA in which either a regional or general anesthetic was used. Student's t-test was used to compare the length of hospital stay and mean patient age. A regional anesthetic was used for 632 CEAs, and a general anesthetic was used for 171 operations. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences in demographics or comorbid medical states. The incidence of perioperative stroke and death did not differ significantly between the regional (2.7%) and the general anesthetic groups (2.3%). However, the incidence of nonneurological, nonfatal complications was significantly less in the regional anesthetic (1.6%) than in the general anesthetic group (14.6%, p<0.0001). Patients undergoing CEA in which a regional anesthetic was used had a significantly lower incidence of cardiopulmonary complications (myocardial infarction and postoperative intubation), cervical complications (neck hematomas and cranial nerve injuries), and urological complications (urinary retention) than patients who underwent surgery after receiving a general anesthetic. CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing CEA in which a regional anesthetic was used had significantly fewer nonneurological, nonfatal complications, particularly cardiopulmonary complications, than similar patients surgically treated after induction of general anesthesia.