Literature DB >> 10658846

Menorrhagia in general practice--disease or illness.

N O'Flynn1, N Britten.   

Abstract

Menorrhagia is a common presentation in primary care. The gynaecological literature defines menorrhagia, as the loss of 80 ml or more of blood per period and guidelines for treatment are based on this definition. There is extensive evidence that the majority of women who complain of heavy bleeding do not fit the medical definition. We interviewed women presenting with menorrhagia to explore their perceptions and their initial interaction with the medical profession. A distinct illness model emerged. Women had a precise understanding of their complaint, so that a change in her cycle was indicative of a problem to many women, without reference to outside criteria. Women attached particular importance to how they felt and to their ability to function and they rejected the medical emphasis on blood loss evaluation. Many women were dissatisfied with the consultation and experienced doctors as being dismissive of their problem. They were seeking an explanation for why their periods had changed and had concerns that related to their understanding of menstrual bleeding. Interviewees were unsure whether period problems could be described as illness, and what range of disturbance was normal. It is suggested that the disease model of menorrhagia is not relevant to the majority of women with this complaint. It is proposed that the disease model be replaced with illness models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10658846     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00318-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  17 in total

1.  Referral for menstrual problems: cross sectional survey of symptoms, reasons for referral, and management.

Authors:  P Warner; H O Critchley; M A Lumsden; M Campbell-Brown; A Douglas; G Murray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-07

Review 2.  Outcome measures for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Stephen D Quinn; Jenny Higham
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2015-12-23

3.  Heavy menstrual bleeding: delivering patient-centred care.

Authors:  Miriam Santer
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Questioning our questions: do frequently asked questions adequately cover the aspects of women's lives most affected by abnormal uterine bleeding? Opinions of women with abnormal uterine bleeding participating in focus group discussions.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2010-03

5.  Why women consult with increased vaginal bleeding: a case-control study.

Authors:  Mark Shapley; Kelvin Jordan; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Experiences of menstruation in high income countries: A systematic review, qualitative evidence synthesis and comparison to low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Dani Jennifer Barrington; Hannah Jayne Robinson; Emily Wilson; Julie Hennegan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials.

Authors:  David D Rahn; Husam Abed; Vivian W Sung; Kristen A Matteson; Rebecca G Rogers; Michelle Y Morrill; Matthew D Barber; Joseph I Schaffer; Thomas L Wheeler; Ethan M Balk; Katrin Uhlig
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Menstrual symptoms: the importance of social factors in women's experiences.

Authors:  Norma O'Flynn
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Management of menorrhagia in primary care-impact on referral and hysterectomy: data from the Somerset Morbidity Project.

Authors:  C Grant; L Gallier; T Fahey; N Pearson; J Sarangi
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Diagnosing menstrual disorders: a qualitative study of the approach of primary care professionals.

Authors:  Norma O'Flynn; Nicky Britten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.