Literature DB >> 10658075

Hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: differential diagnosis and treatment.

P Herman1, V Pugliese, M A Machado, A L Montagnini, M Z Salem, T Bacchella, L A D'Albuquerque, W A Saad, M C Machado, H W Pinotti.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of benign hepatic tumors as hepatic adenoma (HA) and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) remains a challenge for clinicians and surgeons. The importance of differentiating between these lesions is based on the fact that HA must be surgically resected and FNH can be only observed. A series of 23 female patients with benign liver tumors (13 FNH, 10 HA) were evaluated, and a radiologic diagnostic algorithm was employed with the aim of establishing preoperative criteria for the differential diagnosis. All patients were submitted to surgical biopsy or hepatic resection to confirm the diagnosis. Based only on clinical and laboratory data, distinction was not possible. According to the investigative algorithm, the diagnosis was correct in 82.6% of the cases; but even with the development of imaging methods, which were used in combination, the differentiation was not possible in four patients. For FNH cases scintigraphy presented a sensitivity of 38.4% and specificity of 100%, whereas for HA the sensitivity reached 60% and specificity 85.7%. Magnetic resonance imaging, employed when scintigraphic findings were not typical, presented sensitivities of 71.4% and 80% and specificities of 100% and 100% for FNH and HA, respectively. Preoperative diagnosis of FNH was possible in 10 of 13 (76.9%) patients and was confirmed by histology in all of them. In one case, FNH was misdiagnosed as HA. The diagnosis of HA was possible in 9 of 10 (90%) adenoma cases. Surgical biopsy remains the best method for the differential diagnosis between HA and FNH and must be performed in all doubtful cases. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for all patients with adenoma and can be performed safely. With the evolution of imaging methods it seems that the preoperative diagnosis of FNH may be considered reliable, thereby avoiding unnecessary surgical resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10658075     DOI: 10.1007/s002689910059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  38 in total

Review 1.  Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: current diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Agustin Cristiano; Agustin Dietrich; Juan Carlos Spina; Victoria Ardiles; Eduardo de Santibañes
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-06-27

2.  Incidental focal solid liver lesions: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Soussan; Christophe Aubé; Stéphane Bahrami; Jérôme Boursier; Dominique Charles Valla; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Painful hepatic hemangioma: report of a case with an emphasis on sonographic findings.

Authors:  Ryusuke Kato; Hideaki Ishida; Hitoshi Yagisawa; Toru Ishii; Tomoya Komatsuda; Takaharu Miyauchi; Tsutomu Sato; Ken Saito
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Guidelines for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Adenoma in the Era of Molecular Biology: An Experience-Based Surgeons' Perspective.

Authors:  Paulo Herman; Gilton Marques Fonseca; Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger; Vagner Birk Jeismann; Fabricio Ferreira Coelho
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenomas with low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS): effect of size on diagnostic confidence.

Authors:  Vincent Roche; Frederic Pigneur; Lambros Tselikas; Marion Roux; Laurence Baranes; Marjane Djabbari; Charlotte Costentin; Julien Calderaro; Alexis Laurent; Alain Rahmouni; Alain Luciani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of focal nodular hyperplasia: a matter of size.

Authors:  Caroline Bertin; Sophie Egels; Mathilde Wagner; Isabelle Huynh-Charlier; Valérie Vilgrain; Olivier Lucidarme
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of the diagnostic strategies for differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma.

Authors:  Chong Hyun Suh; Kyung Won Kim; Seong Ho Park; Sangjin Shin; Jeonghoon Ahn; Junhee Pyo; Atul B Shinagare; Katherine M Krajewski; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Liver cell adenoma showing sequential alteration of radiological findings suggestive of well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Takayuki Kogure; Yoshiyuki Ueno; Satoshi Sekiguchi; Kazuyuki Ishida; Takehiko Igarashi; Yuta Wakui; Takao Iwasaki; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  [Surgical therapy of benign liver tumors].

Authors:  M Loss; C Zülke; A Obed; O Stöltzing; H J Schlitt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Surgical management of spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular adenoma.

Authors:  Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle Ribeiro Junior; Eleazar Chaib; William Abrão Saad; Luiz Augusto Carneiro D'Albuquerque; Ivan Cecconello
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.