Literature DB >> 10657867

Cost analysis of filgrastim for the prevention of neutropenia in pediatric T-cell leukemia and advanced lymphoblastic lymphoma: a case for prospective economic analysis in cooperative group trials.

C L Bennett1, T J Stinson, D Lane, M Amylon, V J Land, J H Laver.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Growth factor use has been shown to ameliorate chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, leading to shorter hospital stays and lower use of parenteral antibiotics, two costly areas of cancer treatment. Prior reports on pediatric patients have shown evidence of cost savings in some studies, but no such evidence in others. In this study a retrospective analysis compared the costs of inpatient supportive care for pediatric patients with T-cell leukemia and advanced lymphoblastic lymphoma enrolled in a Pediatric Oncology Group trial. PROCEDURE: Patients 1-22 years of age were randomized to receive either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; n = 45) or no G-CSF (n = 43) following induction and two cycles of maintenance therapy. There were no significant differences in neutropenia-related outcomes during the induction phase. During maintenance therapy, G-CSF patients had significantly fewer days to an ANC >500 cells/microl and a trend towards fewer days of hospitalization. Data on resource utilization were tabulated from case report forms. Costs were imputed from national data on hospitalization costs, average wholesale prices of pharmaceuticals, and patient billing information from a single institution.
RESULTS: Total median costs of supportive care were $34,190 for patients receiving G-CSF and $28,653 for patients not receiving G-CSF (P > 0. 05 for the cost difference). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the total cost difference was not statistically significant, even in scenarios that included reasonable variations in estimates of the range of the length of stay, antibiotic regimen, and dosage and cost of G-CSF.
CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of pediatric leukemia, the cost of growth factor may offset potential savings from shorter hospital stays or lower antibiotic use, a finding consistent with that from the Children's Cancer Study Group. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10657867     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-911x(200002)34:2<92::aid-mpo3>3.0.co;2-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol        ISSN: 0098-1532


  4 in total

Review 1.  Haemopoietic growth factors in paediatric oncology: a review of the literature.

Authors:  L M Wagner; W L Furman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Comparison of in-patient costs for children treated on the AAML0531 clinical trial: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Kelly D Getz; Yimei Li; Todd A Alonzo; Matthew Hall; Robert B Gerbing; Lillian Sung; Yuan-Shung Huang; Staci Arnold; Alix E Seif; Tamara P Miller; Rochelle Bagatell; Brian T Fisher; Peter C Adamson; Alan Gamis; Ron Keren; Richard Aplenc
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 3.  Economic evaluations of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Authors:  Marc Esser; Helmut Brunner
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The need for online information on the economic consequences of cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship.

Authors:  Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 5.428

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.