Literature DB >> 10657422

The stroke prognosis instrument II (SPI-II) : A clinical prediction instrument for patients with transient ischemia and nondisabling ischemic stroke.

W N Kernan1, C M Viscoli, L M Brass, R W Makuch, P M Sarrel, R S Roberts, M Gent, P Rothwell, R L Sacco, R C Liu, B Boden-Albala, R I Horwitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: In 1991 we developed the Stroke Prognosis Instrument (SPI-I) to stratify patients with transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke by prognosis for stroke or death in 2 years. In this article we validate and improve SPI-I (creating SPI-II).
METHODS: To validate SPI-I, we applied it to 4 test cohorts and calculated pooled outcome rates. To create SPI-II, we incorporated new predictive variables identified in 1 of the test cohorts and validated it in the other 3 cohorts.
RESULTS: For SPI-I, pooled rates (all 4 test cohorts) of stroke or death within 2 years in risk groups I, II, and III were 9%, 17%, and 24%, respectively (P<0.01, log-rank test). SPI-II was created by adding congestive heart failure and prior stroke to SPI-I. Each patient's risk group was determined by the total score for 7 factors: congestive heart failure (3 points); diabetes (3 points); prior stroke (3 points); age >70 years (2 points); stroke for the index event (not transient ischemic attack) (2 points); hypertension (1 point); and coronary artery disease (1 point). Risk groups I, II, and III comprised patients with 0 to 3, 4 to 7, and 8 to 15 points, respectively. For SPI-I, pooled rates (3 cohorts excluding the SPI-II development cohort) of stroke or death within 2 years in risk groups I, II, and III were 9%, 17%, and 23%, respectively. For SPI-II, pooled rates were 10%, 19%, and 31%, respectively. In receiver operator characteristic analysis, the area under the curve was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.60) for SPI-I and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.65) for SPI-II, confirming the better performance of the latter.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SPI-I, SPI-II achieves greater discrimination in outcome rates among risk groups. SPI-II is ready for use in research design and may have a role in patient counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10657422     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.31.2.456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  40 in total

1.  Prevalence and predictors of statin utilization among patient populations at high vascular risk in Ghana.

Authors:  Fred Stephen Sarfo; Bruce Ovbiagele
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.181

2.  Quality of Care for Veterans With Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke.

Authors:  Dawn M Bravata; Laura J Myers; Greg Arling; Edward J Miech; Teresa Damush; Jason J Sico; Michael S Phipps; Alan J Zillich; Zhangsheng Yu; Mathew Reeves; Linda S Williams; Jason Johanning; Seemant Chaturvedi; Fitsum Baye; Susan Ofner; Curt Austin; Jared Ferguson; Glenn D Graham; Rachel Rhude; Chad S Kessler; Donald S Higgins; Eric Cheng
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 18.302

3.  A Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts short- and long-term all-cause mortality in older hospitalized patients with transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Daniele Sancarlo; Andrea Pilotto; Francesco Panza; Massimiliano Copetti; Maria Grazia Longo; Piero D'Ambrosio; Grazia D'Onofrio; Luigi Ferrucci; Alberto Pilotto
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Predictors of gait velocity among community-dwelling stroke survivors.

Authors:  Ruth E Taylor-Piliae; L Daniel Latt; Joseph T Hepworth; Bruce M Coull
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 5.  Phone-based intervention under nurse guidance after stroke: concept for lowering blood pressure after stroke in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Bruce Ovbiagele
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  The ABCD(2) Score is Highly Predictive of Stroke in Minor Ischemic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Kavian Ghandehari; Fahimeh Ahmadi; Saeed Ebrahimzadeh; Keyvan Shariatinezhad; Kosar Ghandehari
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 6.829

7.  A score to predict early risk of recurrence after ischemic stroke.

Authors:  H Ay; L Gungor; E M Arsava; J Rosand; M Vangel; T Benner; L H Schwamm; K L Furie; W J Koroshetz; A G Sorensen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  The price of bouncing back: one-year mortality and payments for acute stroke patients with 30-day bounce-backs.

Authors:  Amy J H Kind; Maureen A Smith; Jinn-Ing Liou; Nancy Pandhi; Jennifer R Frytak; Michael D Finch
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Screening for kidney disease in vascular patients: SCreening for Occult REnal Disease (SCORED) experience.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; Madhu Mazumdar; George Newman; Andrew S Bomback; Christie M Ballantyne; Allan S Jaffe; Phyllis A August; Abhijit V Kshirsagar
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Smoking cessation and outcome after ischemic stroke or TIA.

Authors:  Katherine A Epstein; Catherine M Viscoli; J David Spence; Lawrence H Young; Silvio E Inzucchi; Mark Gorman; Brett Gerstenhaber; Peter D Guarino; Anand Dixit; Karen L Furie; Walter N Kernan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.