K Paya1, U Rauhofer, W Rebhandl, S Deluggi, E Horcher. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Vienna, Medical School, Waehringerguertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This pilot study was performed to reassess the widespread postulate that laparoscopic surgery is contraindicated in cases of perforating appendicitis. METHODS: A total of 75 children (appendiceal perforation: n = 67; perityphlic abscesses and peritonitis: n = 8) were analyzed in a prospective nonrandomized trial. Ten of them were treated by laparoscopic appendectomy. RESULTS: In the laparoscopy group, both pain and hospitalization were less time-consuming (i.e., by 50% and 19%, respectively). Antibiotics use was down from 2.6 over 6 days to 2.2. over 5.5 days, while the duration of surgery was up by 52%. Wound healing disturbances occurred in 10% (n = 1) and postoperative fever in 50% (n = 5) of patients, compared to 14% (n = 9) and 15% (n = 10) in the group treated by open surgery. All severe complications requiring reintervention (10%; massive subcutaneous abscess, n = 3; retrocolic abscess, n = 2; adhesion-related ileus, n = 3; appendicular stump, n = 1) were associated with open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There was not a single major complication in the laparoscopy group. These unexpected results are in contrast to previous reports and have prompted us to initiate a prospective randomized trial.
BACKGROUND: This pilot study was performed to reassess the widespread postulate that laparoscopic surgery is contraindicated in cases of perforating appendicitis. METHODS: A total of 75 children (appendiceal perforation: n = 67; perityphlic abscesses and peritonitis: n = 8) were analyzed in a prospective nonrandomized trial. Ten of them were treated by laparoscopic appendectomy. RESULTS: In the laparoscopy group, both pain and hospitalization were less time-consuming (i.e., by 50% and 19%, respectively). Antibiotics use was down from 2.6 over 6 days to 2.2. over 5.5 days, while the duration of surgery was up by 52%. Wound healing disturbances occurred in 10% (n = 1) and postoperative fever in 50% (n = 5) of patients, compared to 14% (n = 9) and 15% (n = 10) in the group treated by open surgery. All severe complications requiring reintervention (10%; massive subcutaneous abscess, n = 3; retrocolic abscess, n = 2; adhesion-related ileus, n = 3; appendicular stump, n = 1) were associated with open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There was not a single major complication in the laparoscopy group. These unexpected results are in contrast to previous reports and have prompted us to initiate a prospective randomized trial.
Authors: J Deepak; Prakash Agarwal; R K Bagdi; S Balagopal; R Madhu; P Balamourougane; Zaffer Saleem Khanday Journal: J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg Date: 2008-07
Authors: J Cueto; B D'Allemagne; J A Vázquez-Frias; S Gomez; F Delgado; L Trullenque; R Fajardo; S Valencia; L Poggi; J Ballí; J Diaz; R González; J H Mansur; M E Franklin Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2006-03-16 Impact factor: 3.453