Literature DB >> 10655926

Influence of neuromuscular block, mode of ventilation and respiratory cycle on pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal mask airway.

C Keller1, J Brimacombe.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that the pressure exerted by the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) against the pharyngeal mucosa varied with neuromuscular block, mode of ventilation and the respiratory cycle. We studied 20 anaesthetized adult patients. Microchip sensors were attached to a size 5 LMA at locations approximately corresponding to the base of the tongue, hypopharynx, lateral pharynx, oropharynx, posterior pharynx and piriform fossa. Mucosal pressures were measured with an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O under four conditions during anaesthesia using 2.0 MAC of sevoflurane: (1) apnoeic, non-paralysed; (2) spontaneously breathing, non-paralysed; (3) ventilated, paralysed and (4) non-ventilated, paralysed. In conditions (2) and (3), mucosal pressures were measured at the end of inspiration and expiration. Mean mucosal pressure was less than 10 cm H2O at all locations. There were no significant changes in mucosal pressure at any location between the four conditions. There was no variation between inspiration and expiration. With an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O in these circumstances, mucosal pressures were much less than considered safe for prolonged tracheal intubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10655926     DOI: 10.1093/bja/83.3.480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  5 in total

1.  Muscle relaxant effects on insertion efficacy of the laryngeal mask ProSeal(®) in anesthetized patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Atsushi Fujiwara; Nobuyasu Komasawa; Isao Nishihara; Shinichiro Miyazaki; Shinichi Tatsumi; Wataru Nishimura; Toshiaki Minami
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Superior sealing effect of a three-dimensional printed modified supraglottic airway compared with the i-gel in a three-dimensional printed airway model.

Authors:  Tomohiko Kimijima; Mitsutaka Edanaga; Michiaki Yamakage
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Lower intracuff pressure of laryngeal mask airway in the lateral and prone positions compared with that in the supine position.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Yano; Takashi Imaizumi; Chiho Uneda; Ryosuke Nakayama
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nobuyasu Komasawa; Isao Nishihara; Shinichi Tatsumi; Toshiaki Minami
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Complications Associated with the Use of Supraglottic Airway Devices in Perioperative Medicine.

Authors:  Pavel Michalek; William Donaldson; Eliska Vobrubova; Marek Hakl
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.