Literature DB >> 10655861

A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.

J Seeley1, J L Jensen, J Hutcherson.   

Abstract

This study compared an adhesive hydrocellular dressing with a leading hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers. Forty adult patients of both sexes who had Stage II or III pressure ulcers (according to the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research system) were enrolled in the study and were randomized to either the hydrocellular or hydrocolloid dressing. Dressing changes were done as required, and each ulcer was assessed on a weekly basis. Patients were followed for 8 weeks, until ulcer closure was achieved, or until the patient was withdrawn from the study, whichever occurred first. The hydrocellular dressing was found to compare favorably with the hydrocolloid dressing. In terms of ease of use, the hydrocellular dressing was found to be significantly easier to remove (P < 0.001) and quicker to change (P < 0.001) than the hydrocolloid dressing. No differences were detected between the two dressing groups regarding mean wound pain, odor, and changes in ulcer appearance and ulcer area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10655861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage        ISSN: 0889-5899            Impact factor:   2.629


  6 in total

Review 1.  Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Maggie J Westby; Jo C Dumville; Marta O Soares; Nikki Stubbs; Gill Norman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-22

2.  Economic evaluation of collagenase-containing ointment and hydrocolloid dressing in the treatment of pressure ulcers.

Authors:  E Müller; M W van Leen; R Bergemann
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Management of chronic pressure ulcers: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-07-01

4.  Randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of wrap therapy for wound healing acceleration in patients with NPUAP stage II and III pressure ulcer.

Authors:  Seiji Bito; Akihiro Mizuhara; Sandai Oonishi; Kensuke Takeuchi; Masatsune Suzuki; Kazuhiro Akiyama; Kazuyo Kobayashi; Kayoko Matsunaga
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  A multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive polyurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade II pressure ulcers in primary care and nursing homes.

Authors:  Mireia Guillén-Solà; Aina Soler Mieras; Antònia M Tomàs-Vidal
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 6.  The effectiveness of hydrocolloid dressings versus other dressings in the healing of pressure ulcers in adults and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Franciele Soares Pott; Marineli Joaquim Meier; Janislei Giseli Dorociak Stocco; Karla Crozeta; Janyne Dayane Ribas
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2014 May-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.