Literature DB >> 10655444

Twinship and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer.

J R Cerhan1, L H Kushi, J E Olson, S S Rich, W Zheng, A R Folsom, T A Sellers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine exposure to high levels of endogenous estrogens has been hypothesized to increase the risk of breast cancer. Because estrogens and other pregnancy hormones are substantially elevated in twin pregnancies, and possibly more so in dizygotic twin pregnancies, we evaluated the association between aspects of twin membership (i.e., belonging to a twin pair) and the risk of breast cancer.
METHODS: In a cohort of 29 197 postmenopausal Iowa women with no prior diagnosis of cancer (except for nonmelanoma skin cancer), breast cancer risk factors were determined by use of a mailed questionnaire in 1986 (baseline); twin membership, sex of the twin, and zygosity were determined by use of a follow-up questionnaire in 1992.
RESULTS: Within the cohort, 1.8% (n = 538) of the women reported being a twin; of these, 24% (n = 130) were monozygotic twins, 63% (n = 337) were dizygotic twins, and 13% (n = 71) did not know their zygosity. From 1986 through 1996, 1230 breast cancers in the cohort were ascertained by linkage to the Iowa Cancer Registry. Compared with singletons, women who belonged to a twin pair were at elevated risk of breast cancer (multivariate-adjusted risk ratio [RR] = 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22-2.42), with adjustment for educational level, family history of breast cancer, height, body mass index, body fat distribution, age at menarche, age at first live birth, use of hormone replacement therapy, and alcohol use. Multivariate-adjusted risk was elevated (in comparison with singletons) if the sex of the other twin was female (RR = 1.82; 95% CI = 1.20-2.75); however, this risk was limited to female dizygotic twins (RR = 2.14; 95% CI = 1. 21-3.79), since no excess risk was evident for monozygotic twins (RR = 1.04; 95% CI = 0.43-2.50). The risk to women with a male twin was also elevated (RR = 1.49; 95% CI = 0.80-2.78) in comparison with singletons, but this estimate was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: This cohort study lends further support to the theory that there are important intrauterine influences on carcinogenesis of the breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10655444     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  12 in total

Review 1.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 2.  The Intestinal Microbiome and Estrogen Receptor-Positive Female Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Maryann Kwa; Claudia S Plottel; Martin J Blaser; Sylvia Adams
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Regulatory decisions on endocrine disrupting chemicals should be based on the principles of endocrinology.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; John Peterson Myers; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 4.  The role of genetics in estrogen responses: a critical piece of an intricate puzzle.

Authors:  Emma H Wall; Sylvia C Hewitt; Laure K Case; Chin-Yo Lin; Kenneth S Korach; Cory Teuscher
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pre- and perinatal factors and incidence of breast cancer in the Black Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Lauren E Barber; Kimberly A Bertrand; Lynn Rosenberg; Tracy A Battaglia; Julie R Palmer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Risk of Sex-Specific Cancers in Opposite-Sex and Same-Sex Twins in Denmark and Sweden.

Authors:  Linda J Ahrenfeldt; Axel Skytthe; Sören Möller; Kamila Czene; Hans-Olov Adami; Lorelei A Mucci; Jaakko Kaprio; Inge Petersen; Kaare Christensen; Rune Lindahl-Jacobsen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Intrauterine exposures, pregnancy estrogens and breast cancer risk: where do we currently stand?

Authors:  Pagona Lagiou
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Tallness and overweight during childhood have opposing effects on breast cancer risk.

Authors:  L Hilakivi-Clarke; T Forsén; J G Eriksson; R Luoto; J Tuomilehto; C Osmond; D J Barker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  An epidemiological study of cancer in adult twins born in Norway 1905-1945.

Authors:  T Iversen; S Tretli; E Kringlen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Sue Kyung Park; Daehee Kang; Katherine A McGlynn; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Yeonju Kim; Keun Young Yoo; Louise A Brinton
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.