Literature DB >> 10654856

Reading with eccentric fixation is faster in inferior visual field than in left visual field.

K L Petre1, C A Hazel, E M Fine, G S Rubin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: People with central field loss tend to fixate so that information falls in the inferior or left visual field. Studies of reading from a page of text suggest that using inferior field is advantageous relative to using left visual field. In this study, we investigated whether reading without eye movements in normal peripheral vision is better when text is presented in inferior or left visual field.
METHODS: Reading rates were determined for retinally stabilized rapid serial visual presentation sentences of seven letter sizes, presented at 5 degrees in inferior and left visual field of six normal observers.
RESULTS: When print size is appropriately magnified for peripheral viewing, reading speed in inferior field is faster than in left visual field. There is no significant difference between inferior and left visual field in the print size required to reach maximum reading speed.
CONCLUSIONS: For reading tasks not involving eye movements, there is an advantage in eccentrically fixating such that text falls in inferior rather than left visual field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10654856     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200001000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  10 in total

1.  Reading speed benefits from increased vertical word spacing in normal peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 2.  Functional and cortical adaptations to central vision loss.

Authors:  Sing-Hang Cheung; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Areas of the visual field important during reading in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Robyn Burton; Luke J Saunders; David P Crabb
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Spontaneous and training-induced cortical plasticity in MD patients: Hints from lateral masking.

Authors:  Marcello Maniglia; Vincent Soler; Benoit Cottereau; Yves Trotter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Evaluation of a gaze-controlled vision enhancement system for reading in visually impaired people.

Authors:  Carlos Aguilar; Eric Castet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Does Vertical Reading Help People with Macular Degeneration: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Aurélie Calabrèse; Tingting Liu; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Image Stabilization in Central Vision Loss: The Horizontal Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex.

Authors:  Esther G González; Runjie Shi; Luminita Tarita-Nistor; Efrem D Mandelcorn; Mark S Mandelcorn; Martin J Steinbach
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-13

8.  A comparison of reading, in people with simulated and actual central vision loss, with static text, horizontally scrolling text, and rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  Farah Akthar; Hannah Harvey; Ahalya Subramanian; Simon Liversedge; Robin Walker
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Application of Spatial Cues and Optical Distortions as Augmentations during Virtual Reality (VR) Gaming: The Multifaceted Effects of Assistance for Eccentric Viewing Training.

Authors:  Alexandra Sipatchin; Miguel García García; Yannick Sauer; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.614

10.  The effect of normal aging and age-related macular degeneration on perceptual learning.

Authors:  Andrew T Astle; Alan J Blighe; Ben S Webb; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.