Literature DB >> 10654594

The application of in vitro data in the derivation of the acceptable daily intake of food additives.

K Walton1, R Walker, J J van de Sandt, J V Castell, A G Knapp, G Kozianowski, M Roberfroid, B Schilter.   

Abstract

The acceptable daily intake (ADI) for food additives is commonly derived from the NOAEL (no-observed-adverse-effect level) in long-term animal in vivo studies. To derive an ADI a safety or uncertainty factor (commonly 100) is applied to the NOAEL in the most sensitive test species. The 100-fold safety factor is considered to be the product of both species and inter-individual differences in toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics. Although in vitro data have previously been considered during the risk assessment of food additives, they have generally had no direct influence on the calculation of ADI values. In this review 18 food additives are evaluated for the availability of in vitro toxicity data which might be used for the derivation of a specific data-derived uncertainty factor. For the majority of the food additives reviewed, additional in vitro tests have been conducted which supplement and support the short- and long-term in vivo toxicity studies. However, it was recognized that these in vitro studies could not be used in isolation to derive an ADI; only when sufficient in vivo mechanistic data are available can such information be used in a regulatory context. Additional short-term studies are proposed for the food additives which, if conducted, would provide data that could then be used for the calculation of data-derived uncertainty factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10654594     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6915(99)00107-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  7 in total

1.  Hypolipidemic effect of β-caryophyllene to treat hyperlipidemic rats.

Authors:  Matheus D Baldissera; Carine F Souza; Thirssa H Grando; Pedro H Doleski; Aline A Boligon; Lenita M Stefani; Silvia G Monteiro
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of the effect of tartrazine on the cerebellum, submandibular glands, and kidneys of adult male albino rats.

Authors:  Mohamed A El-Sakhawy; Dina W Mohamed; Yasmine H Ahmed
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Evaluation of Nano-curcumin effects against Tartrazine-induced abnormalities in liver and kidney histology and other biochemical parameters.

Authors:  Gaber E El-Desoky; Saikh M Wabaidur; Zeid A AlOthman; Mohamed A Habila
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  Microarray analysis of toxicogenomic effects of ortho-phenylphenol in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Hyeung-Jin Jang; Chantal Nde; Freshteh Toghrol; William E Bentley
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Tartrazine induces structural and functional aberrations and genotoxic effects in vivo.

Authors:  Latifa Khayyat; Amina Essawy; Jehan Sorour; Ahmed Soffar
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Nigella sativa oil protects against tartrazine toxicity in male rats.

Authors:  Madeha N Al-Seeni; Haddad A El Rabey; Amani Mohammed Al-Hamed; Mazin A Zamazami
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2017-12-28

7.  Perinatal Exposure to Tartrazine Triggers Oxidative Stress and Neurobehavioral Alterations in Mice Offspring.

Authors:  Gadah Albasher; Najla Maashi; Saleh Alfarraj; Rafa Almeer; Tarfa Albrahim; Fatimah Alotibi; May Bin-Jumah; Ayman M Mahmoud
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.