Literature DB >> 10654254

Fluctuating mutation bias and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila.

F Rodríguez-Trelles1, R Tarrío, F J Ayala.   

Abstract

The idea that the pattern of point mutation in Drosophila has remained constant during the evolution of the genus has recently been challenged. A study of the nucleotide composition focused on the Drosophila saltans group has evidenced unsuspected nucleotide composition differences among lineages. Compositional differences are associated with an accelerated rate of amino acid replacement in functionally less constrained regions. Here we reassess this issue from a different perspective. Adopting a maximum-likelihood estimation approach, we focus on the different predictions that mutation and selection make about the nonsynonymous-to-synonymous rate ratio. We investigate two gene regions, alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) and xanthine dehydrogenase (Xdh), using a balanced data set that comprises representatives from the melangaster, obscura, saltans, and willistoni groups. We also consider representatives of the Hawaiian picture-winged group. These Hawaiian species are known to have experienced repeated bottlenecks and are included as a reference for comparison. Our results confirm patterns previously detected. The branch ancestral to the fast-evolving willistoni/saltans lineage, where most of the change in GC content has occurred, exhibits an excess of synonymous substitutions. The shift in mutation bias has affected the extent of the rate variation among sites in Xdh.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10654254     DOI: 10.1007/s002399910001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  18 in total

1.  A new Drosophila spliceosomal intron position is common in plants.

Authors:  Rosa Tarrio; Francisco Rodríguez-Trelles; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  GC-biased segregation of noncoding polymorphisms in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nicolas Galtier; Eric Bazin; Nicolas Bierne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Evolution of gene sequence in response to chromosomal location.

Authors:  Carlos Díaz-Castillo; Kent G Golic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Mutation exposed: a neutral explanation for extreme base composition of an endosymbiont genome.

Authors:  Jennifer J Wernegreen; Daniel J Funk
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Molecular evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup: frequent parameter fluctuations on the timescale of molecular divergence.

Authors:  Hiroshi Akashi; Wen-Ya Ko; Shengfu Piao; Anoop John; Piyush Goel; Chiao-Feng Lin; Alexa P Vitins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Functional bias in molecular evolution rate of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Andrew S Warren; Ramu Anandakrishnan; Liqing Zhang
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Strong evidence for lineage and sequence specificity of substitution rates and patterns in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Peter F Arndt; Andrew G Clark; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Analysis of a shift in codon usage in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Powell; Erminia Sezzi; Etsuko N Moriyama; Jennifer M Gleason; Adalgisa Caccone
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Strong regional heterogeneity in base composition evolution on the Drosophila X chromosome.

Authors:  Wen-Ya Ko; Shengfu Piao; Hiroshi Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Molecular population genetics of Xdh and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila.

Authors:  David J Begun; Penn Whitley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.