S F Jeng1, K I Yau, L C Chen, S F Hsiao. 1. School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, No. 7 Chun-Shan S Rd, Taipei, Taiwan. Jeng@ha.mc.ntu.edu. tw.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of measurements obtained with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) for evaluation of preterm infants in Taiwan. SUBJECTS: Two independent groups of preterm infants were used to investigate the reliability (n=45) and validity (n=41) for the AIMS. METHODS: In the reliability study, the AIMS was administered to the infants by a physical therapist, and infant performance was videotaped. The performance was then rescored by the same therapist and by 2 other therapists to examine the intrarater and interrater reliability. In the validity study, the AIMS and the Bayley Motor Scale were administered to the infants at 6 and 12 months of age to examine criterion-related validity. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intrarater and interrater reliability of measurements obtained with the AIMS were high (ICC=.97-.99). The AIMS scores correlated with the Bayley Motor Scale scores at 6 and 12 months (r=.78 and.90), although the AIMS scores at 6 months were only moderately predictive of the motor function at 12 months (r=.56). CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The results suggest that measurements obtained with the AIMS have acceptable reliability and concurrent validity but limited predictive value for evaluating preterm Taiwanese infants.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of measurements obtained with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) for evaluation of preterm infants in Taiwan. SUBJECTS: Two independent groups of preterm infants were used to investigate the reliability (n=45) and validity (n=41) for the AIMS. METHODS: In the reliability study, the AIMS was administered to the infants by a physical therapist, and infant performance was videotaped. The performance was then rescored by the same therapist and by 2 other therapists to examine the intrarater and interrater reliability. In the validity study, the AIMS and the Bayley Motor Scale were administered to the infants at 6 and 12 months of age to examine criterion-related validity. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intrarater and interrater reliability of measurements obtained with the AIMS were high (ICC=.97-.99). The AIMS scores correlated with the Bayley Motor Scale scores at 6 and 12 months (r=.78 and.90), although the AIMS scores at 6 months were only moderately predictive of the motor function at 12 months (r=.56). CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The results suggest that measurements obtained with the AIMS have acceptable reliability and concurrent validity but limited predictive value for evaluating preterm Taiwanese infants.
Authors: Mugdha V Rairikar; Laura E Case; Lauren A Bailey; Zoheb B Kazi; Ankit K Desai; Kathryn L Berrier; Julie Coats; Rachel Gandy; Rebecca Quinones; Priya S Kishnani Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 4.797
Authors: Joanne M George; Roslyn N Boyd; Paul B Colditz; Stephen E Rose; Kerstin Pannek; Jurgen Fripp; Barbara E Lingwood; Melissa M Lai; Annice H T Kong; Robert S Ware; Alan Coulthard; Christine M Finn; Sasaka E Bandaranayake Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 2.125