Literature DB >> 10653502

How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic bases and inferential consequences.

D H Wigboldus1, G R Semin, R Spears.   

Abstract

The linguistic expectancy bias is defined as the tendency to describe expectancy-consistent information at a higher level of abstraction than expectancy-inconsistent information. The communicative consequences of this bias were examined in 3 experiments. Analyses of judgments that recipients made on the basis of linguistically biased information generated by transmitters indicated that behavior in expectancy-consistent messages was attributed more to dispositional and less to situational factors than behavior in expectancy-inconsistent messages. Moreover, this effect was mediated by the level of linguistic abstraction of the messages. These findings provide direct evidence for the hypothesis that recipients are sensitive to variations in linguistic abstraction in spontaneous language use because of stereotypes. Results are discussed with respect to the interpersonal aspects of stereotyping.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10653502     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.1.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  10 in total

1.  Why do providers contribute to disparities and what can be done about it?

Authors:  Diana J Burgess; Steven S Fu; Michelle van Ryn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Does stereotype threat affect women in academic medicine?

Authors:  Diana Jill Burgess; Anne Joseph; Michelle van Ryn; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  The Innuendo Effect: Hearing the Positive but Inferring the Negative.

Authors:  Nicolas Kervyn; Hilary B Bergsieker; Susan T Fiske
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-01-01

4.  Effects of Including Gender Pronoun Questions in Surveys.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Luke Lopez; Amy Gomez; Yan Fossat
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-09

5.  Mindful attention reduces linguistic intergroup bias.

Authors:  Moses M Tincher; Lauren A M Lebois; Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Mindfulness (N Y)       Date:  2015-10-15

6.  Gender Can Influence Student Experiences in MD-PhD Training.

Authors:  Anna S Heffron; Katarina M Braun; Cora Allen-Savietta; Amarette Filut; Chelsea Hanewall; Anna Huttenlocher; Jo Handelsman; Molly Carnes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  The influence of language form and conventional wording on judgments of illness.

Authors:  Cristine C Reynaert; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2007-07

8.  A Preliminary Investigation into Effects of Linguistic Abstraction on the Perception of Gender in Spoken Language.

Authors:  A B Siegling; Michelle Eskritt; Mary E Delaney
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2014

9.  An inconclusive study comparing the effect of concrete and abstract descriptions of belief-inconsistent information.

Authors:  Katherine A Collins; Richard Clément
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Cross-linguistic evidence for gender as a prominence feature.

Authors:  Yulia Esaulova; Lisa von Stockhausen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.