Literature DB >> 10653454

Cost-effectiveness of screening patients for hepatitis C.

F D Gordon1.   

Abstract

This review discusses the benefits and drawbacks of public health screening for hepatitis C, its cost effectiveness, and the various strategies to identify individuals infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). Of the estimated 4 million people infected with hepatitis C in the United States, approximately 50% are unaware of their infection. Both the high incidence and recent improvements in the treatment of hepatitis C make it likely that a screening program for this disease would be beneficial to patients, their families, and to the public. Testing for anti-HCV antibody is now widely available, automated, sensitive (>95%), and relatively inexpensive (approximately $80 per test). Interferons and the introduction of ribavirin into the treatment armamentarium have improved the effectiveness of therapy. Lifestyle modifications can be made to decrease the risk of transmission, and patients can be counseled to avoid alcohol consumption and receive hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccinations, if appropriate. An additional benefit of early detection is that family members can be alerted to the risk factors for hepatitis C. Such education increases overall public awareness of the disease and may improve prevention efforts. Several national agencies within the United States and in Europe have issued guidelines for hepatitis C screening. Each of these calls for screening of high-risk populations, which include individuals who have received blood products and intravenous drug users. Targeted screening and improved treatment outcomes will likely show identification of those with hepatitis C to be cost effective in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10653454     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00379-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  5 in total

1.  Hepatitis C screening and management practices: a survey of drug treatment and syringe exchange programs in New York City.

Authors:  Chi-Chi N Udeagu Pratt; Denise Paone; Rosalind J Carter; Marcelle C Layton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Self-reported hepatitis C virus antibody status and risk behavior in young injectors.

Authors:  Holly Hagan; Jennifer Campbell; Hanne Thiede; Steffanie Strathdee; Lawrence Ouellet; Farzana Kapadia; Sharon Hudson; Richard S Garfein
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Assessment of hepatitis C infection in injecting drug users attending an addiction treatment clinic.

Authors:  B P Smyth; E Keenan; J J O'Connor
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Hepatitis C testing practices and prevalence in a high-risk urban ambulatory care setting.

Authors:  W N Southern; M-L Drainoni; B D Smith; C L Christiansen; D McKee; A L Gifford; C M Weinbaum; D Thompson; E Koppelman; S Maher; A H Litwin
Journal:  J Viral Hepat       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.728

5.  Physician nonadherence with a hepatitis C screening program.

Authors:  William N Southern; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Bryce D Smith; Elisa Koppelman; M Diane McKee; Cindy L Christiansen; Allen L Gifford; Cindy M Weinbaum; Alain H Litwin
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.926

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.