Literature DB >> 10653203

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of abecarnil and diazepam in the treatment of patients with generalized anxiety disorder.

K Rickels1, N DeMartinis, B Aufdembrinke.   

Abstract

In a multicenter, double-blind trial, 310 patients who had received a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder were treated for 6 weeks with either abecarnil, diazepam, or placebo at mean daily doses of 12 mg of abecarnil or 22 mg of diazepam administered three times daily. Patients who were improved at 6 weeks could volunteer to continue double-blind treatment for a total of 24 weeks. The maintenance treatment phase allowed the comparison of taper results for the three treatments at several study periods (0-6 weeks, 7-12 weeks, and more than 12 weeks). Slightly more diazepam (77%) and placebo (75%) patients completed the 6-week study than abecarnil patients (66%). At intake and baseline, after a 1-week placebo washout, the patient was required to have a Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety score of > or =20. Major adverse events for both abecarnil and diazepam were drowsiness, dizziness, fatigue, and coordination difficulties. Clinical improvement data showed that both abecarnil and diazepam produced statistically significantly more symptom relief than did placebo after 1 week of treatment. At 6 weeks treatment (using last observation carried forward analysis), however, only diazepam still differed significantly (p < 0.01) from placebo. High placebo response (56% moderate to marked global improvement) at 6 weeks, as well as a slightly lower nonsignificant improvement rate observed with abecarnil, a partial y-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonist, when compared with diazepam, a full GABA agonist, most likely contributed to our findings. Finally, taper results showed that only diazepam and not abecarnil caused the presence of temporary discontinuation symptoms, but only in patients who had been treated for at least 12 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10653203     DOI: 10.1097/00004714-200002000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0271-0749            Impact factor:   3.153


  8 in total

Review 1.  Treating generalised anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Alison Tonks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-03-29

Review 2.  Generalised anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Christopher K Gale; Jane Millichamp
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-10-27

Review 3.  Generalised anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Christopher K Gale; Jane Millichamp
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2007-11-20

Review 4.  Contextual conditioning in rats as an animal model for generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Laura Luyten; Debora Vansteenwegen; Kris van Kuyck; Loes Gabriëls; Bart Nuttin
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  Comparing the efficacy of benzodiazepines and serotonergic anti-depressants for adults with generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Angelina F Gomez; Abigail L Barthel; Stefan G Hofmann
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.889

6.  The diagnosis and treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Borwin Bandelow; Reinhard Boerner J; Siegfried Kasper; Michael Linden; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen; Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 7.  Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders.

Authors:  Martin A Katzman; Pierre Bleau; Pierre Blier; Pratap Chokka; Kevin Kjernisted; Michael Van Ameringen; Martin M Antony; Stéphane Bouchard; Alain Brunet; Martine Flament; Sophie Grigoriadis; Sandra Mendlowitz; Kieron O'Connor; Kiran Rabheru; Peggy M A Richter; Melisa Robichaud; John R Walker
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 8.  The cost effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Ifigeneia Mavranezouli; Nick Meader; John Cape; Tim Kendall
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.981

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.