Literature DB >> 10652977

Biological coagulation findings in third-generation oral contraceptives.

J Conard1.   

Abstract

An increased risk of venous thrombosis has been demonstrated in women receiving oral contraceptives (OCs). This risk has been primarily associated with the oestrogen content, but recent studies showed that the progestogen may also play a role. A higher risk was found with the so-called third-generation (desogestrel, gestodene) as compared with the second-generation progestogens (levonorgestrel). The risk was approximately two-fold. These unexpected results have been the subject of many debates, and bias--such as selection bias--has been suggested. The existence of bias cannot be completely excluded, but the thrombotic risk seems however to be slightly higher with the third-generation progestins. Haemostatic changes have been observed during OC intake. Both coagulation and fibrinolytic activity are increased: the beneficial profibrinolytic effect may counterbalance the deleterious procoagulant effect. This may explain that the absolute risk of venous thromboembolism is low during OC treatments. Some women who have pre-existing haemostatic abnormalities such as deficiency in antithrombin or activated protein C resistance with factor V Leiden, may be at a higher risk. The biological plausibility of the increased risk related to the third-generation progestogens has been explored. Theoretically, this could be due to an increased coagulation or to a lack of increased fibrinolysis as compared with second-generation progestogens. The only difference presently reported with third-generation OCs is a decreased sensitivity to activated protein C, possibly resulting in a hypercoagulability of greater magnitude. The selection bias suggested in epidemiological studies may also exist for the latter study, as women taking third- or second-generation OCs were not randomized. The possible increased risk related to third-generation OCs should not change the known general contra-indications. Practical guidelines are proposed for women with personal or family history of venous thromboembolism, and for those with a congenital cause of thrombophilia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10652977     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/5.6.672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  11 in total

Review 1.  Hormonal contraception and thrombotic risk: a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Cameron C Trenor; Richard J Chung; Alan D Michelson; Ellis J Neufeld; Catherine M Gordon; Marc R Laufer; S Jean Emans
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  Global coagulation assays in hypercoagulable states.

Authors:  Hui Yin Lim; Geoffrey Donnan; Harshal Nandurkar; Prahlad Ho
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Albumin, oral contraceptives, and venous thromboembolism risk in astronauts.

Authors:  Sara R Zwart; Serena M Auñón-Chancellor; Martina Heer; M Mark Melin; Scott M Smith
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2022-04-07

4.  Long term use of oral contraceptives without thrombosis in patients with FV Leiden polymorphism: a study of 37 patients (2 homozygous and 35 heterozygous).

Authors:  A Girolami; D Tormene; S Gavasso; C Bertolo; B Girolami
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Venous thromboembolism associated with combined oral contraceptive use: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Yong-Su Jang; Eun Sil Lee; Yang-Ki Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

6.  Effects of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing nomegestrol acetate and 17β-oestradiol compared with one containing levonorgestrel and ethinylestradiol on haemostasis, lipids and carbohydrate metabolism.

Authors:  Ulla M Ågren; Marjatta Anttila; Kristiina Mäenpää-Liukko; Maija-Liisa Rantala; Hilkka Rautiainen; Werner F Sommer; Ellen Mommers
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Comparative study of the effects of combined oral contraceptives in hemostatic variables: an observational preliminary study.

Authors:  Bianca Stocco; Helen F Fumagalli; Silvio A Franceschini; Edson Z Martinez; Cleni M Marzocchi-Machado; Marcos Felipe S de Sá; Maria Regina T Toloi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  Venous thromboembolism in women: new challenges for an old disease.

Authors:  André Luiz Malavasi Longo de Oliveira; Adilson Ferraz Paschôa; Marcos Arêas Marques
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2020-07-06

9.  Family history of venous thromboembolism is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism in combined oral contraceptive users: a nationwide case-control study.

Authors:  Bengt Zöller; Henrik Ohlsson; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2015-10-21

10.  The effects of oral contraceptive usage on thrombin generation and activated protein C resistance in Saudi women, with a possible impact of the body mass index.

Authors:  Abdulrahman B O Mohamed; Hilde Kelchtermans; Joke Konings; Jamilla van Daal; Anas Al Marzouki; Steve Harakeh; Bas de Laat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.