Literature DB >> 10652883

Is spinal anaesthesia safe in pre-eclamptic toxaemia patients?

S M Ahmed1, R M Khan, S Bano, P Ajmani, A Kumar.   

Abstract

Thirty-three patients of pre-eclamptic toxaemia underwent caesarean section (CS) under general anaesthesia (n = 16) and spinal anaesthesia (n = 17). The Apgar score at 1, 5 and 10 minutes of the babies following spinal anaesthesia (SA) were only marginally better than that of general anaesthesia (GA; P > 0.05). The incidence of complication following GA (68.8%) were significantly (P < 0.05) more than that of SA (47.1%). Commonest complications following GA were intra-operative hypertension (68.8%) followed by difficult intubation (25%), pulmonary oedema (12.8%), delayed recovery (12.8%) and mortality (4.3%). While following SA complications were intra-operative hypotension (47.1%), difficult SA (29.4%) and intra-operative vomiting (5.9%). The nature of complications following GA were more serious which may even lead to mortality (4.3%), whereas following SA it was less serious and easily manageable. Hence SA is not as unsafe as it is thought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10652883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Med Assoc        ISSN: 0019-5847


  1 in total

1.  Subarachnoid block for caesarean section in severe preeclampsia.

Authors:  Sujata Chaudhary; Rashmi Salhotra
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.